Answer:
Results from method B is more reliable than method A.
Explanation:
The two method that are used for the analysis produced different results. The first method that is method A gives higher value of the iodine content than the method B.
When 
was added to water, method A showed an increased in the iodine content and it increases with the increase in the amount of .
Where as in the method B, there is no change in the results. Therefore the measurements provided by the method A shows an inference of ion.
The measurement of the iodine content is affected by the presence of the ion in water.
Since in method B there is no change in measurement, it is independent of the presence ion in water.
As higher iodine content is given by method A, so ion must be present in original water that must be interfering the measurement. Hence, method B is more reliable.
I believe the answer would be C. slows down, hope this helps:)
Answer:
It will take 5492 seconds to electroplate 0.5 mm of gold on an object .
Explanation:
Mass of gold = m
Volume of gold = v
Surface area on which gold is plated = 
Thickness of the gold plating = h = 0.5 mm = 0.05 cm
1 mm = 0.1 cm
Density of the gold = 
Moles of gold = 
According to reaction, 1 mole of gold required 3 moles of electrons,then 0.152 moles of gold will require :
of electrons
Number of electrons = N =
Charge on single electron = 
Total charge required = Q
Amount of current passes = I = 8 Ampere
Duration of time = T
It will take 5492 seconds to electroplate 0.5 mm of gold on an object .
2HgO=2Hg + O2
433,18 g. = 32 g
x. = 250 g
x= 3 384,21875 g of HgO is needed
What happened after that ? If you don’t mind me asking .
