Answer: the correct answer is B. Tax depreciation for the period exceeds book depreciation.
Answer:
11,513
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Initial bacteria = 200
Growth rate r(t) = 
Now,
Total growth after 3 hours = 
or
Total growth after 3 hours = 
or
Total growth after 3 hours =![450.268[\frac{e^{1.12567t}}{1.12567}]^3_0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=450.268%5B%5Cfrac%7Be%5E%7B1.12567t%7D%7D%7B1.12567%7D%5D%5E3_0)
[ ∵
]
Thus,
Total growth after 3 hours = 400 × ![[{e^{1.12567t}]^3_0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%7Be%5E%7B1.12567t%7D%5D%5E3_0)
or
Total growth after 3 hours = 400 × ![[{e^{1.12567(3)}-e^{1.12567(0)}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%7Be%5E%7B1.12567%283%29%7D-e%5E%7B1.12567%280%29%7D%5D)
or
Total growth after 3 hours ≈ 11313
Hence,
Total bacteria after 3 hours = Initial bacteria + Total growth after 3 hours
= 200 + 11313
= 11,513
Answer:
B) $2,850
Explanation:
1: Find the discount: $3,000*5% = $150
2: Subtract the discount: $3,000 - $150 = $2,850
Answer:
The answer is given below
Explanation:
Compounding frequency is the number of times the interest is paid in a year. A higher compounding frequency for a investment with the same initial investment and time horizon would produce more interest and profit as compared to that with a lower compounding frequency. But for a smaller initial investment or less time horizon of higher compounding frequency as compared to larger initial investment or more time horizon of lower compounding frequency, that of the lower compounding frequency is more desirable because it would produce more interest.