The hang time of the ball is 4.08 s
Explanation:
The ball is in free fall motion: this means that it is acted upon gravity only, so its acceleration is the acceleration of gravity,

downward (the negative sign refers to the downward direction).
Since this is a uniformly accelerated motion, we can solve the problem by using the following suvat equation:

where
v is the final velocity
u is the initial velocity
a is the acceleration
t is the time
First we calculate the time it takes for the ball to reach the maximum height, where the velocity is zero:
v = 0
Substituting:
u = +20 m/s

we find t

The motion of the ball is symmetrical, so the total time of flight is just twice the time needed to reach the maximum height, therefore:

Learn more about free fall:
brainly.com/question/1748290
brainly.com/question/11042118
brainly.com/question/2455974
brainly.com/question/2607086
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
hi, the reason is for friction so that they don't fall. subscribe to me on you tube. name is my brainly name
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:The simple pendulum calculator finds the period and frequency of a ... Acceleration of gravity (g) ... Pendulum length (L) ... First of all, a simple pendulum is defined to be a point mass or bob (taking ... For example, it can be equal to 2 m. ... Find the frequency as the reciprocal of the period: f = 1/T = 0.352 Hz
Answer:
638 m.
Explanation:
From the question given above, the following data were obtained:
Initial velocity (u) = 94 m/s
Final velocity (v) = 22 m/s
Time (t) = 11 s
Distance (s) =?
We can obtain the distance travelled by using the following formula:
s = (u + v) t /2
s = (94 + 22) × 11 /2
s = 116 × 11 /2
s = 1276 /2
s = 638 m
Thus, the distance travelled is 638 m.
I actually believe for the first question, it would be complete destructive interference as the amplitude and the approximate wavelength for each are the same and will completely or entirely cancel out, rather than simply decreasing or lowering the amplitude as in the bottom question.
The amplitude for the first will be 0, as the 2 waves will cancel each other out. The amplitude of the second, will be 3x, I believe, assuming the amplitude of the first is 2x and the second is 1x, in a constructive interference, I believe the amplitudes would add up.
Likewise for the bottom, I believe you would be subtracting the supposed amplitude of the first which is 2x from 1x which would be 1x.