Answer:
d. 301,000
Explanation:
Given that the cost per textbook is $27, we know that the addition of variable and fixed Cost gives total cost.
We will multiply variable cost per textbook of $20 with current volume of book sold per year 43,000, which gives a total variable cost of $860,000.
Also, total cost would be 43,000 multiplied with $27 , which is $1,161,000 minus the total variable cost of $860,000 equals $301,000 which is the associated fixed cost.
Answer:
the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75
Explanation:
The computation of the marginal propensity to consume is shown below:
MPC = Change in consumption ÷Change in disposable income
where,
The Change in consumption is 1500
ANd, the Change in disposable income is 2000
So,
MPC is
= $1,500 ÷ $2,000
= 0.75
hence, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75
Hyundai's success has been attributed to their AGGRESSIVE GOAL SETTING. The articles that review the success of the Hyundai company believed that the success of the company is due to many factors which include: internal transfer of experienced staff, focusing on localized production, the codification of previous experience and aggressive goal setting.
Answer:
D) She volunteers to do the mundane tasks others avoid, and she does things like buying birthday cards for co-workers and organizing parties.
Explanation:
Noelle is someone that is an average performer, so she will be open to doing mundane tasks since she is not overly worried about having a star performance.
She is also some one that spends more time than she should socializing with friends in other departments.
So she would be more prone to buying birthday cards for co-workers and organizing parties.
Noelle is an average performer with good social skills so she will be one that does not prioritise performing better than others
Answer and Explanation:
The Risk of an investment that can be minimized or removed by mixing several portfolio assets is called risk diversification.
Risk of an investment asset that can not be minimized or removed by inserting that asset is considered a non-diversifiable risk to a diversified investment portfolio.
So as per the question since the risk of the portfolio decreased from 20 to 40 the portion of the risk eliminated is diversifiable risk and the remaining would be considered as a non-diversifiable risk.
