Serious attempts were made to implement penitentiary. what became known as the medical model of corrections began in which decade.
Penitentiary comes from the Latin penitential, which means "repentance". Prison is a place where people are sent to repent for their sins. Penitentiary can also be used as an adjective to describe something done to indicate penance, like the scarlet "A" on Hester Prynne's chest.
State or Federal Penitentiary for Punishment and Correction of Convicted Felons - Compare correctional facilities, correctional facilities, prisons, arrests. Merriam-Webster details on correctional services.
Prisons or correctional facilities hold people for long periods of time. B. Has been in custody for years and is run by a state or federal government. Prisons hold people for shorter periods of time (for example, for reduced sentences or pretrial detention) and are usually run by a local government (usually Sherri County).
Learn more about medical model here: brainly.com/question/12349842
#SPJ4
Well, first of all, America's leaders did not want to draft a 'national constitution' at this time. I think you're getting this confused with the Deceleration of Independence.
In 1776, the leaders wanted to officially declare independence from the country which they beat in the war--Great Brian. Essentially, the document outlines why these folks wanted to be their own nation. It details their complaints of King George III.
Answer: B.
Neuroticism
Explanation:
This is a condition that put someone in a negative and anxious emotional state. It's not a medical condition but a personality trait. People with this condition suffer from depression, guilt, anger and anxiety.
Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
