Answer:
The forward reaction is occurring at a faster rate than the reverse reaction.
Explanation:
Reaction quotient (Q) of the given reaction is -
![Q=\frac{[NO]^{2}}{[N_{2}][O_{2}]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Q%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BNO%5D%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%5BN_%7B2%7D%5D%5BO_%7B2%7D%5D%7D)
where [NO], ![[N_{2}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BN_%7B2%7D%5D)
and ![[O_{2}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BO_%7B2%7D%5D)
represents concentrations of respective species at a certain time.
Here = 0.80 M, = 0.050 M and [NO] = 0.10 M
So, 
Hence 
It means that forward reaction is faster than reverse reaction at that point. Because then only concentration of NO is higher than concentrations of and which makes Q higher than K.
Answer:
C. Golden rice enriched with vitamin A
Answer:
the third option
Explanation:
The circuit is incomplete and broken, and the lights in the circuit do not shine.
An open circuit means an incomplete circuit.
The first option is wrong since the lights do not shine in an open circuit.
The second option is wrong since an open circuit is incomplete.
The fourth option is also wrong since an open circuit is broken or incomplete.
∴ The third option is correct.
Answer:
Lost pigment of marker when dipped in alcohol
Explanation:
dependent viable = output
so it's the output of what happens after the input.
- she put the marker in the water which is the independent variable, that's the input
- the output or the result of that decision is having lost pigment in the marker
Hi!
The reason for reviewing and replicating work of other scientists is influenced by two factors listed in the answer:
1. An experiment may have had errors that the scientist did not recognize. <u>(unintentional) </u>
2. The results of individual scientists may be influenced by bias. <u>(intentional)</u>
<em>Personal motivations may often influence a scientist to manipulate the results to best suit his/her hypothesis, consequently leading to scientific fraud. </em>
While other options listed are elements of the scientific method, they are not the reasons behind the review and replication of a scientist's work by others.
