Answer:
E. More than thirteen
Explanation:
S is the set of multiples of 7, meaning 7, 14, 21, 28 and so on to infinity
T is the same but with 13 instead
Both sets are infinite.
The first intersection would be 7x13 (91)
Though it would be difficult to find 14 of them to prove it, we don't have to since we know both sets are infinite and will eventually have intersections the higher they go
I dont believe that there is a forest in arizona..
Answer:
Explanation:
Choosing the wrong friends may subject you to unrealistic life expectations which will result in conflicts in your family. Keeping bad company might result in one becoming bad too. There is a saying which says "show me your friend and I will tell you who you are".
If a person keeps bad friends, there is a high possibility of the person becoming bad. A family always wants the best for its members, so, if you keep bad friends, you'll most likely have conflicts with your family because they'll be scared of you getting bad.
The family will try as much as possible to separate you from the bad friend which will cause a lot of misunderstanding if you don't listen to them.
Hope it helps,.....
Maybe this is my last answer..... :)
Answer: A=12
Explanation:
4.5
The amount of chemical remaining after twelve seconds in the first reaction is:
A = 12 - 0.5(12)
= 12 - (6)
= 6
In the dissolved reaction, the amount of chemical loses half of itself every four seconds. This is the same thing as dividing by 2 every four seconds.
This is an exponential decay, so the amount of chemical divides by 4 every eight seconds, and by 8 seconds every twelve seconds. The amount remaining after twelve seconds in the second reaction is:
A' = 12/8
= 3/2
= 1.5
The difference between the amounts of chemical remaining is:
6 - 1.5 = 4.5
Therefore, A is 4.5 g greater than A' after twelve seconds.
<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
