Express 89% as a fraction

Help plzzz Select the correct answer.

Morgarella [4.7K]

<h3>Answer: C) 3</h3>

=========================================================

Explanation:

f(x) is the outer function, so the final output -8 corresponds to f(x)

We see that f(-4) = -8 in the first column of the table. I'm starting with the output and working my way backward to get the input. So we started with -8 and worked back to -4.

Then we move to the g(x) function to follow the same pattern: start with the output and move to the input. We start at -4 in the g(x) bubble and move to 3 in the x bubble.

In short, g(3) = -4

So,

f(g(x)) = f(g(3)) = f(-4) = -8

We see that x = 3 leads to f(g(x)) = -8

3 0

3 years ago

27=3 raised to power (2x_1)

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

$27=3^{2x-1}\\\\3^{3}=3^{2x-1}\\$

Bases are equal. So, compare powers

2x - 1 = 3

Add 1 to both sides,

2x = 3+1

2x = 4

Divide both sides by 2

x = 4/2

x = 2

7 0

3 years ago

Joseph owns a hot dog stand and sells specialized hot dogs. He charges $1.50 for a plain hot dog and then an additional $0.50 fo

Lilit [14]

Hot Dog Stand

Let

C--------> total cost of the hot dog

x-------> is the number of toppings

we know that

$C=0.5x+1.5$

where

The slope of the linear equation is equal to $0.5\frac{\$}{topping}$

The y-coordinate of the y-intercept of the linear function is equal to $\$1.5$

That means -------> This is the cost of the hot dog without topping

Hamburgers Stand

Let

C--------> total cost of the hamburger

x-------> is the number of toppings

we know that

$C=0.25x+2.50$

where

The slope of the linear equation is equal to $0.25\frac{\$}{topping}$

The y-coordinate of the y-intercept of the linear function is equal to $\$2.5$

That means -------> This is the cost of the hamburger without topping

therefore

the answer is

The linear equation of the hamburger cost is equal to

$C=0.25x+2.50$

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

On the first visit to the veterinarian's office, Cora's kitten weighed 550 grams. On the second visit, the kitten had gained 350

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

On first visit, weight =550 g

Weight gained on second visit= 350 g

Weight gained on third visit= 300 g

Present weight=550+350+300= 1200

Weight gained=1200-550=650

Percentage of weight increased

-------->650/550 × 100 = 118.18\%

So the kitten gained 118% weigh

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Maureen McIlvoy, owner and CEO of a mail order business for wind surfing equipment and supplies, is reviewing the order filling

lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

Maureen's null hypothesis is, H₀: p₁ ≥ p₂.

Step-by-step explanation:

Maureen McIlvoy, owner and CEO of a mail order business for wind surfing equipment and supplies wants test whether her goal of shipping 100% orders within 24 hours is achieved or not.

After reviewing the order filling operations at her warehouses she determines that neither the East coast nor the West coast warehouse has achieved the goal. But the East Coast warehouse has consistently out-performed the West Coast warehouse.

To check whether this determination is correct or not Maureen's staff randomly selected 200 orders from the West Coast warehouse (population 1) and 400 orders from the East Coast warehouse (population 2).

Of the 200 orders from the West Coast warehouse, 190 were shipped within 24 hours. And of the 400 orders from the East Coast warehouse, 372 were shipped within 24 hours.

The hypothesis can be defined as follows:

H₀: The proportion of orders that were shipped within 24 hours is not more for East Coast warehouse than for West Coast warehouse, i.e. p₁ ≥ p₂.

Hₐ: The proportion of orders that were shipped within 24 hours is more for East Coast warehouse than for West Coast warehouse, i.e. p₁ < p₂.

Thus, Maureen's null hypothesis is, H₀: p₁ ≥ p₂.

8 0

3 years ago