1: base
2: acute angle
3: dimensions
4: height
5: obtuse angle
6: area
7: square units
Answer:
-3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
692.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer
See the attached files for details.
Step-by-step explanation:
Can you read DVI or PS files?
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
pdf
</span>
Answer and Step-by-step explanation: The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are:


To test it, use F-test statistics and compare variances of each treatment.
Calculate F-value:



F = 1.8356
The <u>critical value of F</u> is given by a F-distribution table with:
degree of freedom (row): 20 - 1 = 19
degree of freedom (column): 20 - 1 = 19
And a significance level: α = 0.05
= 2.2341
Comparing both values of F:
1.856 < 2.2341
i.e. F-value calculated is less than F-value of the table.
Therefore, failed to reject
, meaning there is <u>no sufficient data to support the claim</u> that sham treatment have pain reductions which vary more than for those using magnets treatment.