The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be 400 cm.
The given parameters:
- <em>Length of the string, L = 100 cm</em>
<em />
The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves is calculated as follows;

for first mode: n = 1

for second mode: n = 2

For the third mode: n = 3

For fourth mode: n = 4

Thus, we can conclude that, the wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be 400 cm.
The complete question is below:
A string of length 100 cm is held fixed at both ends and vibrates in a standing wave pattern. The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be:
A. 400 cm
B. 200 cm
C. 100 cm
D. 67 cm
E. 50 cm
Learn more about wavelengths of travelling waves here: brainly.com/question/19249186
Answer:
A. carbon and boron
Explanation:
Carbon and boron is not an alloy.
An allow forms between metals and metals using their huge electron could.
Carbon is a non-metal, boron is a also a non-metal
Two non-metals combining together does not make an alloy.
Iron, nickel, aluminum are all metals.
A boiling pot of water (the water travels in a current throughout the pot), a hot air balloon (hot air rises, making the balloon rise) , and cup of a steaming, hot liquid (hot air rises, creating steam) are all situations where convection occurs.
Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/1581851#readmore
Answer: proton mass 1 and neutron has no mass number
Explanation: proton because of positive charge neutron because of negative charge
a. The disk starts at rest, so its angular displacement at time
is

It rotates 44.5 rad in this time, so we have

b. Since acceleration is constant, the average angular velocity is

where
is the angular velocity achieved after 6.00 s. The velocity of the disk at time
is

so we have

making the average velocity

Another way to find the average velocity is to compute it directly via

c. We already found this using the first method in part (b),

d. We already know

so this is just a matter of plugging in
. We get

Or to make things slightly more interesting, we could have taken the end of the first 6.00 s interval to be the start of the next 6.00 s interval, so that

Then for
we would get the same
.