If a mother is having an outbreak of genital herpes at the time of childbirth, it can expose the baby to both types of HSV, and may put them at risk for serious complications. So the answer is D.
Answer:
* The conception of the separation of powers has been applied to the United Kingdom and the idea of its executive (UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Leader), judicial (Britain and Ribs, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and legislative (UK Parliament, Scottish Parliament, Public Get together for Ridges and Northern Ireland Gathering) capacities.
* Truly, the obvious consolidation of the executive and the legislature, with an powerful Prime minister drawn from the biggest party in parliament and typically with a protected safe majority, driven scholars to battle that the separation of power isn't relevant to the United Kingdom. Be that as it may, as of late it appears to have been received as a vital piece of the UK constitution.
Explanation:
The United Kingdom is ruled by a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy. The head of state is the monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) while the head of government is the Prime Minister (presently David Cameron, the head of the Conservative Party).
In contrast to the US, the UK has an unwritten constitution. Instead of being founded on a particular document, the constitution depends on legislation and precedent, just as European Union laws.
Answer:
The agricultural region.
Explanation:
The agricultural region of Georgia was the most affected by this headlines because there is a lot of agricultural land which depends on the rainfall for the fulfillment of the water requirement of the crop. There is no rainfall occurs in the summer which causes abnormal dryness condition due to which the agriculture industry is greatly affected because there is no water present for the crop.
- How can photos be used as alternate forms of argument?
It can be used as a visual proof to convince others about your point.
Argument often derived from personal conviction. This personal conviction often really hard to get rid off even if the oppositions provides a clear and logical argument to debunk it.
Visual proof often harder to deny since it can depict a certain situation in a more convincing way rather than personal recollection . Often times, this can be a lot stronger compared to trying to convince others simply by using words.
- Can a photo convince you to take a specific action or to think a certain way?
Absolutely.
For example, Let's say that you hear 2 people arguing in the court. Person A accused person B for killing person C at December 12th. Person B denied the accusation.
At this point, you probably not really sure who's in the right.
But, let's say that<u> person B showed a photo that proved he is actually in another city</u> on December 12th and it is impossible for him to be at the crime scene on the time of person C attack.
That photo could easily win the argument in person B's favor and convince others who witness it that he is telling the truth.