0.0102 moles Na₂CO₃ = 1.08g of Na₂CO₃ is necessary to reach stoichiometric quantities with cacl2.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
Based on the reaction
CaCl₂ + Na₂CO₃ → 2NaCl + CaCO₃
1 mole of CaCl₂ reacts per mole of Na₂CO₃
we have to calculate how many moles of CaCl2•2H2O are present in 1.50 g
- We must calculate the moles of CaCl2•2H2O using its molar mass (147.0146g/mol) in order to answer this issue.
- These moles, which are equal to moles of CaCl2 and moles of Na2CO3, are required to obtain stoichiometric amounts.
- Then, we must use the molar mass of Na2CO3 (105.99g/mol) to determine the mass:
<h3>
Moles CaCl₂.2H₂O:</h3>
1.50g * (1mol / 147.0146g) = 0.0102 moles CaCl₂.2H₂O = 0.0102moles CaCl₂
Moles Na₂CO₃:
0.0102 moles Na₂CO₃
Mass Na₂CO₃:
0.0102 moles * (105.99g / mol) = 1.08g of Na₂CO₃ are present
Therefore, we can conclude that 0.0102 moles Na₂CO₃ is necessary.to reach stoichiometric quantities with cacl2.
To learn more about stoichiometric quantities visit:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/28174111</h3>
#SPJ4
The new volume of the air bubble that has an initial volume of 5.0 ml released at the bottom of a lake where the pressure is 3.0 atm is 15mL.
<h3>How to calculate volume?</h3>
The volume of a given gas can be calculated by using the following formula:
P1V1 = P2V2
Where;
- P1 = initial pressure
- V1 = initial volume
- P2 = final pressure
- V2 = final volume
5 × 3 = 1 × V2
15 = V2
V2 = 15mL
Therefore, the new volume of the air bubble that has an initial volume of 5.0 ml released at the bottom of a lake where the pressure is 3.0 atm is 15mL.
Learn more about volume at: brainly.com/question/1578538
Answer:ype your answer here: Conclusions What conclusions can you draw about the identity of the unknowns? Write an evidence-based claim. Type your answer here: Evaluate the
Explanation:
Answer:
A PROFESSOR WARNED HIM NOT TO GO INTO PHYSICS. Not long after the 16-year-old Planck got to the University of Munich in 1874, physics professor Philipp von Jolly tried to dissuade the young student from going into theoretical physics. Jolly argued that other scientists had basically figured out all there was to know.
Explanation:
