1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adell [148]
4 years ago
10

A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11

p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
A. Admissible, because it tends to show that the clerk is an unreliable witness.
B. Admissible, because it has bearing on the clerk's truthfulness and veracity.
C. Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
D. Inadmissible, because it is hearsay not subject to any exceptions.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Marta_Voda [28]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.

Explanation:

A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.

How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?

The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements is true?
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

the answer is A the copyright expires after the life of the author and an additional 70 years

8 0
4 years ago
Sovereignty refers to Group of answer choices a government headed by a king. a division of authority between the national govern
kiruha [24]
All of the above. It is supreme power or authority and uthority of a state to govern itself.
8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following explains the behavior of normally law-abiding people who act destructively when they are part of a crowd?
Rashid [163]

Answer:

B.  deindividuation

Explanation:

deindividuation refers to a situation when people lose their self-identity when they are in the middle of a certain crowd.

Often times, when individuals gather with a crowd, the value that the individual held can be different with the value/principles that are held by the crowd. Because of this, the individual tend to feel the pressure to conform with the crowd's value in order to feel accepted. This is why the deindividuation occurs.

7 0
4 years ago
Why is canada the top trading partner for the united states?
creativ13 [48]
It’s the closest, so you wouldn’t have to spend as much for overseas shipping. Probably
3 0
3 years ago
In a study based on Tajfel’s theory of social identity, Cathy is randomly assigned to Group A, and Sara is randomly assigned to
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

in-group Favoritism                                        

Explanation:

In-group favoritism: The term in-group favoritism is also called as intergroup bias, in-group–out-group bias, in-group bias, or in-group preference.

In-group favoritism is defined as a phenomenon of an individual favoring the members of his or her group i.e, the in-group over the members of another group i.e, the out-group. In-group favoritism can be expressed in terms of allocation of resources, other's evaluation, and in various other ways.

The in-group favoritism leads to develop a powerful influence on the group as well as the individual's behavior.

In the question above, the statement signifies the in-group favoritism.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • A rectangular page is designed to contain 81 square inches of print. The margins at the top and bottom of the page are each 1 in
    8·1 answer
  • Acting in ways that bring about expectations or judgments of others that have been expressed to us is known as __________.
    11·2 answers
  • Before the 8th century, paper was only produced in which places?
    9·2 answers
  • The California leadership considered a proposal that would build a canal to bring water to the southern part of the state. The s
    7·2 answers
  • Strengths of a convenience sample are that it: A. Enriches the data because it includes persons with experience B. Is easy and i
    8·1 answer
  • A Birthday Brainstorm
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this? I’m not sure if it’s right…
    6·1 answer
  • Alexis was a creative baker who constantly leaned on her elbow in applying fanciful decorations onto cakes. She was supporting J
    14·1 answer
  • What was the final result of the research conducted in africa whose mission was to prevent vertical transmission of hiv from mot
    10·1 answer
  • Sophia Grace Brownlee is fourteen. In most states, Sophia would be considered a minor because she is under the age of a. twenty-
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!