All categories

3 years ago

∆RED ≅ ∆_ By rule ___Will Give Brainiest if Possible

Mathematics

2 answers:

mart [117]3 years ago

8 0

The two triangles are not congruent.

Licemer1 [7]3 years ago

4 0

These triangles are not congruent. They only have 2 sides and one angle in common, and that is not a congruency theorem.

You might be interested in

What is the opposite of 1/2

Amanda [17]

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the value of x in the equation x – y = 30, when y = 15?

vovikov84 [41]

X should be 45
45-15=30

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Given the parent function f(x) = x², define the function g(x) that

Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

Part 1) $g(x)=-x^{2}$

Part 2) $g(x)=(x+3)^{2}$

Part 3) $g(x)=x^{2}+7$

Step-by-step explanation:

we have

The parent function is $f(x)=x^{2}$

This is a vertical parabola open upward with vertex at origin (0,0)

Part 1) Reflection over the x-axis

The rule of the reflection across the x=axis is equal to

(x,y) ------> (x,-y)

f(x) -----> g(x)

The function g(x) will be

$g(x)=-x^{2}$

Part 2) Horizontal shift left 3 units

The rule of the translation is

(x,y) ------> (x-3,-y)

f(x) -----> g(x)

The function g(x) will be

$g(x)=(x+3)^{2}$

Part 3) Vertical shift up 7 units

The rule of the translation is

(x,y) ------> (x,y+7)

f(x) -----> g(x)

The function g(x) will be

$g(x)=x^{2}+7$

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is the following relation a function? (1 point)<br><br> yes<br> no

IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

yes I believe it is a function

3 0

3 years ago

Lauren says the two expressions 3x+4(2x+5) and 6x +5x+5 are equivalent

Allisa [31]

Answer:

so, lauren isn't correct

Step-by-step explanation:

3x + 4 (2x + 5) = 6x + 5x + 5

3x + 8x + 20 = 11x + 5

11x + 20 ≠ 11x + 5

8 0

1 year ago

∆RED ≅ ∆_______ By rule _________Will Give Brainiest if Possible

∆RED ≅ ∆_ By rule ___Will Give Brainiest if Possible