Answer: Fe<em>(aq)</em>+S<em>(aq)</em>=FeS<em>(s)</em>
Explanation: The Sodium and Bromine are spectator ions because they don't react with anything, you can see this by writing the ionic equation like so:
1.) Molecular formula (given): FeBr2 (aq)+Na2S (aq)= FeS(s)+2NaBr(aq)
Each dissolved FeBr2 breaks up into one Fe with a charge of 2+ and two Br with a negative charge. This gives you:
Fe(aq)+ 2Br(aq)+Na2S(aq)=FeS(s)+2NaBr
2.) Now repeat what was shown with the other compounds in the given molecular formula, and pay attention to the states that each ion is in (solid, liquid, aqueous, gas) because this will give you the ionic equation, which from there you can get rid of any ions that don't change amount or state.
3.) Ionic formula: Fe(aq)+ <u>2Br(aq)</u>+<u>2 Na(aq)</u>+S (aq)=FeS(s)+<u>2 Na(aq)+2Br(aq)</u>
4.)When you've derived a total ionic equation (above), you'll find that some ions appear on both sides of the equation in equal numbers. For example, in this case two Na cations and two Br anions appear on both sides of the total ionic equation. What does this mean? It means these ions don't participate in the chemical reaction. They're present before and after the reaction. Nothing happens to them. So those are removed and you're left with the net ionic: Fe(aq)+S(aq)=FeS(s)
Hope this helps :)
Answer:5
Explanation:(H3) is 3 (H3)2 is 5
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
Answer:
84.8%
Explanation:
Step 1: Given data
Bob measured out 1.60 g of Na. He forms NaCl according to the following equation.
Na + 1/2 Cl₂ ⇒ NaCl
According to this equation, he calculates that 1.60 g of sodium should produce 4.07 g of NaCl, which is the theoretical yield. However, he carries out the experiment and only makes 3.45 g of NaCl, which is the real yield.
Step 2: Calculate the percent yield.
We will use the following expression.
%yield = real yield / theoretical yield × 100%
%yield = 3.45 g / 4.07 g × 100% = 84.8%
I believe the answer is C
