Ok so we can see for every 2 cups of medium coffee, the balance goes down 5.30$. So that means that for every coffee, her balance goes down 2.65$. Solving for the x-intercept means how many medium coffees can I get until my balance is 0. First, we have to find the y-int so it's easy. The slope is -2.65 because for every medium coffee, her balance goes down 2.65$. So we have y=-2.65x+b. Plugging in any point, I choose (4,14.40), we get 14.4 = -2.65 × 4 +b. Solving for b we get 25 for the y intercept, meaning the equation is y = -2.65x + 25 . To find the x intercept, we set y=0. So we have 0 = -2.65x+25. Solving for x we get approx. 9.4. We can't have decimals so we round down to 9. So the x int is ≈ 9.4 meaning we can only buy 9 coffee and have a little extra. But, if the problem said how many more coffees can she get, then here is how we do it. Since she already got 4 coffees, and the max is 9, we do 9-4 and we get 5, so she can buy 5 coffeed more.
Answer:
Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias </em>because its indicators taking values of 1 and 0 where 1 would represent taking action by the legal system and 0 would represent not taking action by the legal system. as
The researcher plans to regress national income per capita based on the effect of the legal system
applying the formula for addressing omitted variable bias ( attached below )
All you need to do is 1/8 and 1 half because 1/ 2 is a half so I'll see what you got then text it to me
Answer:
R = 2 % per annum.
Step-by-step explanation:
SI = (P*T*R) /100
$1000 = ($10000 * 5 yrs *Rate) /100
2, because ab=ac and they both equal 6 when plugged in