Answer:
48 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
first divide 6 miles by 2.5 miles, that will be 2.4 miles, then multiply by 20
Answer:
Part a. The graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b. The values in table model a proportional relation.
3.5 minutes per mile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a.
The graph shown in the question representing Janet's data is not a straight line although it passes through the origin.
That is why the rate of change of distance with time is not constant.
Therefore, the graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b.
If we plot the data in the table using distance in miles along the y-axis and time in minutes along the x-axis, then we will get a straight line passing through the origin.
So, the values in the table model a proportional relation.
Now, Tarik's unit rate in minutes per miles will be
minutes per mile. (Answer)
Answer:
Every time a new piece of equipment is added to the system, if ifs not properly optimized within the scope of the entire system, you'll end up with wasted energy and operational inefficiencies
Step-by-step explanation:
440÷100×12
52.8
440-52.8
387.2
MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLSSSSSS
Answer: The equation not represent a proportional relationship because the line don't passes through the origin
Step-by-step explanation: