To find the total of 3/4 and 4/5 is to add them together. However, in order to add them together you need to find the least common denominator (LCD). And the LCD of both denominators would be 20, because that is the smallest number both 4 and 5 can divide into. And here is the tricky part, now you have to change the numerators. So since 3/4th's now has a denominator of 20 you have to make the 3 match the 20. So 4 times what it 20? It is 5. So now multiply 5 by three and that will give you 15/20, which can reduce to 3/4 which means that you did this correctly! Now repeat the same steps with 4/5:
4/5=4/20
20÷5=4
4•4=16
16/20 (16/20 can reduce to 4/5 which means you did this correctly.
Now to add them keep the denominators the same and only add the numerators:
15/20 + 16/20 = 31/20
Now this as a mixed number would be 1 11/20. I hope this was helpful!
Answer:
$478.80
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that 15 players two coaches and 21 parents attend this year sports banquet the cost of each meal was $12 plus 5% sales tax.
First of all, we will find cost of each meal with tax as:




Now, we will find total persons at the sport banquet as:


To find the total cost of food for the banquet, we will multiply cost of food for each person by 38.


Therefore, the total cost of food for the banquet is $478.80.
Answer:
Im not sure what the answer is
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
First convert them to improper fractions
5 4/6 = (5×6 + 4)/6= 34/6
4 1/3 = (4×3 + 1)/3=13/3
Now make them have the same denominator. In order to do this, you must multiple 13/3 by 2/2, so both the denominators equal 6.
13/3 × 2/2 = 26/6
34/6 + 26/6 = 60/6 = 10
There's a bit of ambiguity in your question...
We know that
, which means
.
I see three possible interpretations:
• If
, then

• If
, then

• If
, then
![f(7)=-15=\sqrt[k]{2+7}\implies-15=9^{1/k}\implies\dfrac1k=\log_9(-15)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=f%287%29%3D-15%3D%5Csqrt%5Bk%5D%7B2%2B7%7D%5Cimplies-15%3D9%5E%7B1%2Fk%7D%5Cimplies%5Cdfrac1k%3D%5Clog_9%28-15%29)
which has no real-valued solution.
I suspect the second interpretation is what you meant to write.