Based on my experiences so far, the approach to geometry that I prefer is: Euclidean Geometry. This is because the problems are easy to visualize since they are restricted to two-dimensional planes.
<h3>Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions?</h3>
The approach that is easier to extend beyond two dimensions is Euclidean Geometry. Again, this is because of how it deals with shapes and visualization of the same.
Take for instance a triangle; it is easy to go from a two-dimensional equilateral triangle to a square pyramid.
<h3> What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other?</h3>
Analytical geometry is a superior technique for discovering objects (points, curves, and planes) based on their qualities in some situations than Euclidean geometry is in others (for example, when employing topography or building charts).
Learn more about Euclidean Geometry at;
brainly.com/question/2251564
#SPJ1
Answer:
x=12
Step-by-step explanation:
The right side is a right triangle
The base is 1/2 of the bottom or 5
The height is x and the hypotenuse is 13
We can use the Pythagorean theorem
a^2 +b^2 = c^2
5^2 +x^2=13^2
25+x^2 = 169
Subtract 25 from each side
25-25+x^2 = 169-26
x^2 =144
Take the square root of each side
sqrt(x^2) = sqrt(144)
x= 12
Answer: The probability of having a sample mean of 115.2 or less for a random sample of this size equal 0.508.
Step-by-step explanation: Please find the attached file for the solution
7+3= 10
Let's take 1,400 is to be seperated between A and B
Amount of money A will get = 1400* 7/10= 980
Amount of money B will get = 1400* 3/10= 420
Checking the answer:
980+420 = 1,400
Hence, 1,400 will be shared by ratio 7:3 is 980 and 420.
Correct me, if I am wrong :)
Have a great day!
Thanks!
