Slavery should be abolished- this common belief was held by Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, and John Brown.
Option: C
Explanation:
Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison and John Brown are active socialist, reformer and writer. All of them belongs to the era which deals with the slavery system. All of them strongly oppose the slavery. They were in favor of determinism. Under their supervision American civil war was continued.
Slavery is a system in which people forcefully brought from other countries to follow the orders of higher classes in the society. Economically weak and deprived class, the tribals from various parts of America forced to be slaves.
Answer:
The pro of the 11th amendment are that states cannot be sued by a citizen who does not live in that state in federal court. The con is that states gain some immunity and you cannot petition them for lost property or funds.
Explanation:
The Pros of the 11th amendment:
The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution is a complicated but short amendment that has various implications. Basically it says that the federal courts of the United States cannot hear cases where a citizen who lives in another state or the citizen of another country is petitioning to sue that state. This gives individual states their sovereignty so they can act without bringing upon themselves a lawsuit. It is also good in terms of our state taxes and the costs to administrate the state. It seems that before the 11th Amendment of the US Constitution was ratified, most of the cases that were brought against a state in this way were suing the state for money they had failed to pay back or the return of property. This is the case with a British citizen named William Vassall who apparently sued the state of Massachusetts for the land they confiscated from him during the Revolutionary War. This would become an expensive process for each state if it were still possible.
The Cons of the 11th amendment:
The 11th Amendment has negative implications too in the sense that you can be wronged by a state and you will never be able to redress it by appealing to federal courts. It gives states a level of immunity if they are confiscating property from people who live out of state or who come from another country. It seems to put the rights of the state above the rights of a citizen or foreign citizen in this regard.
Answer:
This statement is FALSE
Explanation:
Civil law is based on certain laws that are organized in codes. When law courts interpret civil law, they consider these specific codes. They do not use tradition, precedent and custom. This is why a civil law system is less flexible, since the judges rely upon the details of the codes and the do not interpret further than that.
Answer: a) selecting an impartial leader.
Explanation:
Groupthink is the technique which is used by a group of people to make a decision without considering opinion, thoughts,suggestion etc of members of group.This leads to elimination of creativity and degraded decisions.
To eliminate group-think, the possible way is to choose a impartial leader of that group. Impartial leader will tend to welcome and hear opinion and suggestion from members and also will not expect that everyone should to think about particular result.
Other options are incorrect because people who raise objection are also required so that their objection can be considered for betterment of decision.Conformity cannot help in removing group think.Outside experts are already not a part of group.
Thus, the correct option is option(a).
Answer:
Spears
Explanation:
Native americans used spears made out of stone to hunt animals to make a place to settle with no fear of wild animals.
