Business ethics will never tell you exactly what to do in all decisions. The study of business ethics is designed to help you understand the importance of your decisions, inform you of impacts, describe the ethical decision-making process, and help you recognize ethical issues, but it will not tell you what to do. It will simply give you the tools necessary to make a decision.
Answer:
C. the starvation of up to 35 million people.
Explanation:
Collectivization was first introduced in the USSR by Joseph Stalin between 1929-1933 and his purpose for starting this process was to limit the powers of the Kulaks, who were the rich peasants. The program was also aimed at improving agriculture. China adopted this same policy under the rule of Mao Zedong between 1949-1976. Also known as <em>The Great Leap Forward </em>era, this process sought to make China a socialist economy and also increase productivity in agriculture.
The resultant effect of this process was mass starvation of about 35 million people in 1959. Although the government referred to floods and droughts as the cause of this starvation, it was actually the result of collectivization. When Diang Xiaping came into power in 1978, he instituted reforms in the collectivization process that proved successful.
Answer:
Equity.
Explanation:
Brand equity is the added value that creates a positive impact about the brand name in the minds of a customer. The given definition of brand equity was proposed by Davis Aaker. We can understand brand equity as the image or reputation that any brand holds in the minds of a customer.
Answer:
the answer is electrical work
Explanation:
um I just looked it up to be honest
Answer: bribery and conflict of interest
Explanation: In simple words, bribery refers to the act under which one individual tries to persuade the behavior of another individual for his benefit by offering him or her monetary benefits.
Whereas, conflict of interest refers to a situation when someone has the authority to make decisions that benefits himself more than the entity he is working for.
Hence we can conclude that the above case depicts bribery and conflict of interest.
