Answer:
The speed on motorboat is 20 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
here, we want to find the speed on the motorboat
if he has a speed of x mph on the motor boat, his speed on the ski will be (x + 10) mph
The total hours is 4 hours
Mathematically; speed = distance/time
Time on ski is 27/x+ 10
Time on motor boat is 62/x
The addition of both is 4
Thus;
27/(x + 10) + 62/x = 4
27(x) + 62(x + 10) = 4(x)(x + 10)
27x + 62x + 620 = 4(x^2 + 10x)
89x + 620 = 4x^2 + 40x
4x^2 -49x-620 = 0
using the quadratic formula;
{-b ± √(b^2-4ac)}/2a
where a = 4, b = -49 and c = -620
= 49 ± √(-49)^2-4(4)(-620)/8
So we have
49+ 111/8 or 49-111/8
Speed cannot be negative
(49 + 111)/8
= 20 mph
Answer:
$6
Step-by-step explanation:
let x and y be the number of chip and pretzel bags respectively :
4x%2B2y%3 C=20
:
if x=1 then 4%281%29%2B2y%3C=20--->{{2y<=16}}}--->y%3C=8 :
if x=3 then 4%283%29%2B2y%3C=20--->{{2y<=8}}}--->y%3C=4 :
so chips 1 and pretzels 8 :
chips 3 and pretzels 4.
The additive inverse of the expression -3/w is 3/w
<h3>How to determine the
additive inverse?</h3>
The expression is given as:
-3/w
The law of additive inverse states that
For an expression x, the additive inverse is -x
This means that the additive inverse of the expression -3/w is 3/w
Hence, the additive inverse of the expression -3/w is 3/w
Read more about additive inverse at
brainly.com/question/1548537
#SPJ1
If w≠0, what is the additive inverse of the expression below? -3/w
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio of its areas is equal to
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
If two figures are similar, then the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared
In this problem the scale factor is equal to the ratio 10:3
Let
z-------> the scale factor
so
z2=(10/3)2=100/9
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>1. A. You allow the passenger to board his flight when the passenger has a weapon.</u>
<u>2. B. You select the passenger for further inspection when the passenger has no weapon.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. Remember, a Type I error in simple words means that the assumption "the passenger has a weapon" (null hypothesis) is <em>actually true,</em> but the airport security screener <em>incorrectly concluded it is false. </em>In other words, he assumed the passenger had no weapon and allowed the passenger to board his flight <u>when he actually did have one.</u>
<em>2. While, </em><em>a </em><em>Type II error </em><em>means that </em>the assumption "the passenger has a weapon" (null hypothesis) is <em>actually false, </em>but the airport security screener <em>incorrectly concluded it is true. </em>In other words, he assumed the passenger had a weapon and selected the passenger for further inspection <u>when he actually didn't have one.</u>