Answer:
A) They would be indifferent, as Sally's income net of costs equals $25,000.
Explanation:
Sally's economic profit = accounting profit - opportunity costs
- accounting profit = $12,000
- opportunity costs = $25,000 - $15,000 in lost salaries + $2,000 (lost investment revenue) = $12,000
economic profit = $12,000 - $12,000 = $0
Since the economic profit is $0, Sally should be indifferent between running her own business or working for someone else.
Well it is the toltal of the cost that will be created by it did it and got it correct
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
When supply is perfectly inelastic, the supply curve is vertical as shown in the attached plot. Thus, the tax that shifts the supply curve upward would have no effect on the equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumers. Since equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumer don't change there's no burden on them. However, no team's owners would receive a lower after tax price and thus bearing the entire tax burden.
That it increases the money supply and the inflation is higher. More money can be loaned out by the bank.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. As a premium expense
= ($0.460 - $0.44) × 695,000
= $13,900
b. As a difference of 3 months spot rate and spot rate
= ($0.455 - $0.44) × 695,000
= $10,425
The first one represents the premium expense for $13,900 and the second part represents the adjustment to the net income in a positive way
