Answer:
Despite this inconvenience, there are other renewable sources that can be utilized as a more sufficient fuel source than gasoline. Unlike gasoline, which is also a pollutant that can damage the land that we walk, the water we consume, and the air we breathe, air, electricity, and water vapor can serve a purpose as a alternative source of fuel. “Currently, electric and hybrid cars only make up about 2 percent of the cars on the road. Making the other 98 percent more efficient saves money, reduces dependence on foreign oil and cuts pollution while keeping new cars affordable and appealing to most buyers.” (Reed, Richard. (Thecarconnection.com) The significance of using more fuel efficient vehicles as well as vehicles that use alternative fuel sources can be essential to the health and well being of all inhabitants on this planet. Vehicular technology also has an influence on the vital organs that people need to survive. “A number of health problems can occur if an individual is exposed to gasoline for long periods of time. The symptoms of gasoline-related health problems can vary from relatively minor ones to severe ones.” (Davis, Jen. Ehow.com) After gasoline evaporates, it becomes a part of the necessities we need for existence, such as the air and water. Through the cycle of evaporation, gasoline becomes a carcinogen, a dangerous .
Our society today has a dependency on advancing technology to improve our way of life as well as the lives of other individuals. Some of us are enamored with the advancement of vehicular technology as well as the way automobiles are used in order to impact our way to get to work, school or to vacate. As the advancement of vehicular technology improves, so does the need of providing safer and more efficient vehicles for transportation. The purpose of automobiles today is to do such things as transport important items and documents, as well as to get to and from the desired destination and efficiently and effectively as possible.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB)
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB) is a law that came into being to repeal existing laws so that banks, investment companies, and other financial services companies could merge. It was enacted in November 1999 by the 106th Congress of the United States.
This law is applicable to the entire insurance agents, brokers, and financial institutions and it highlights the rules around the privacy of information these agencies obtain from customers.
Hey there,
Brainly is a website ran by a large team of people but they are also frequently busy. Please do be patient while their team gets back to you, they are people just like you and I.
Please have a good day. :)
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the <em>United States v. Booker</em> (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
Answer:
D: 30
Explanation:
well exits are 1 mile apart, so 25 + 30 is 55, hence the distance between exit 25 and exit 55 is 30 miles, i hope this helps u!! :D
