Answer:
<u>ADVANTAGES OF UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS</u>
<em>Rapport and sensitivity - informality allows interviewer to gain rapport so more likely to open up. e.g. Labov in formal interview found it hard to open up as uneasy as linguistically deprived but by using relaxed style (e.g. sitting on floor) children relaxed and opened up</em>
<em>Rapport and sensitivity - informality allows interviewer to gain rapport so more likely to open up. e.g. Labov in formal interview found it hard to open up as uneasy as linguistically deprived but by using relaxed style (e.g. sitting on floor) children relaxed and opened upchecking understanding - easier for interviewer and interviewee to check each others meanings. - if interviewee doesn't understand question they can ask - or if interviewer is unsure what interviewees meanings are can ask follow up questions to find out more</em>
<em>Rapport and sensitivity - informality allows interviewer to gain rapport so more likely to open up. e.g. Labov in formal interview found it hard to open up as uneasy as linguistically deprived but by using relaxed style (e.g. sitting on floor) children relaxed and opened upchecking understanding - easier for interviewer and interviewee to check each others meanings. - if interviewee doesn't understand question they can ask - or if interviewer is unsure what interviewees meanings are can ask follow up questions to find out moreFlexibility - no fixed set of questions so can explore whats interesting/relevant at the time. Interviewer can find new ideas and hypotheses</em>
<u>DISADVANTAGES OF UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS</u>
<em>Practical Problems - Unstructured interviews take long time to conduct - limits number that can be carried out = small sample size compared with methods such as questionnaires - less representative</em>
<em>Practical Problems - Unstructured interviews take long time to conduct - limits number that can be carried out = small sample size compared with methods such as questionnaires - less representativeReliability - not reliable as not standardized - each one unique as may ask different questions to different people if something interesting occurs so its almost impossible to replicate</em>
<em>Practical Problems - Unstructured interviews take long time to conduct - limits number that can be carried out = small sample size compared with methods such as questionnaires - less representativeReliability - not reliable as not standardized - each one unique as may ask different questions to different people if something interesting occurs so its almost impossible to replicateEthical Issues - In an interview it may be hard to not answer questions that may be sensitive or that interviewee doesnt want to talk about - also issues with confidentiality or harm if sensitive topic</em>
<u>ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS </u>
<em>Structured interviews introduce more objectivity into your hiring process—even when there are multiple interviewers involved. By creating a standardized list of questions and assessment methods, you can make equitable comparisons between candidates because you've left less room for common interviewer biases.</em>
<u>DISADVANTAGE OF STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS </u>
<em>The candidate is required to plan more in advance.</em>
<em>The candidate is required to plan more in advance.The questions need development, review, and testing to approve and implement.</em>
<em>The candidate is required to plan more in advance.The questions need development, review, and testing to approve and implement.The pre-planned set of questions is at risk of being revealed, which can help applicants game the system.</em>
<em>The candidate is required to plan more in advance.The questions need development, review, and testing to approve and implement.The pre-planned set of questions is at risk of being revealed, which can help applicants game the system.The questions may not seem personal or relevant to each individual applicant.</em>
