Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
Answer:
C) would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong?
Explanation:
Solomon Asch research was designed to answer a straightforward question, namely: <em>would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong? </em>This research was made by Asch to test conformity in ambiguous situations. Two important conclusions of the research are that people tend to conform to the majority of the group of opinion even if they know their answer is wrong, and that the size of the group is important when deciding.
<span>Many people hope that the government will fix the problem. </span>
