Answer: The answer is given below
Explanation:
It should be noted that the split limits approach is used by several auto insurance policies and this simply combines per person and occurrence approach.
For every accident, three dollars amount are being applied. The first limit is simply a per person limit which is the maximum amount that one injured person will get. The second limit is simply the per occurrence limit which is the maximum amount that all the injured persons will get while the third limit applies during the claim of property damage as it is the maximum amount that will be paid for damages by an insurer to property that results from the accident.
since the split is 50/100/20, it implies that $50,000 medical coverage for every injured person, $100,000 injury coverage for all accident victims and then $20,000 for property damage.
1. Bill's insurance company will pay $20000.
2. Amount Bill will pay:
= $17,603 + $3,136 + $9,659 - $20,000
= $30,398 - $20,000
= $10,398
A company in monopolistic opposition produces an allocatively green output degree even as a company in best opposition produces a productively green output degree.
The long-run equilibrium answer in monopolistic opposition usually produces 0 monetary income at a factor to the left of the minimal of the common overall value curve. The life of excessive limitations to access prevents corporations from coming into the marketplace even withinside the long run.
Therefore, it's far viable for the monopolist to keep away from opposition and hold making tremendous monetary income withinside the long run. One feature of a monopolist is that it's far a income maximizer. Since there's no opposition in a monopolistic marketplace, a monopolist can manage the charge and the amount demanded. The degree of output that maximizes a monopoly's income is calculated through equating its marginal value to its marginal revenue.
Learn more about company in monopolistic here:
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ4
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
The answer is C. only liable on pre-formation debt until a novation occurs.
Explanation:
The corporation and the third-party agree to release the promoter from liability and to substitute the corporation in place of the promoter as the party liable on the contract. May be express or implied.