1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
3 years ago
6

The University of Arkansas recently approved out of state tuition discounts for high school students from any state. The student

s must qualify by meeting certain standards in terms of GPA and standardized test scores. The goal of this new policy is to increase the geographic diversity of students from states beyond Arkansas and its border states. Historically, 90% of all new students came from Arkansas or a bordering state. Ginger, a student at the U of A, sampled 180 new students the following year and found that 157 of the new students came from Arkansas or a bordering state. Does Ginger’s study provide enough evidence to indicate that this new policy is effective with a level of significance 10%? What would be the correct decision?
a. Reject H0; conclude that the new policy does not increase the percentage of students from states that don’t border Arkansasb. Fail to reject H0; conclude that the new policy increases the percentage of students from states that don’t border Arkansas
c. Reject H0; conclude that the new policy increases the percentage of students from states that don’t border Arkansas
d. Fail to reject H0; conclude that the new policy does not increase the percentage of students from states that don’t border Arkansas
Mathematics
1 answer:
Fudgin [204]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

z=\frac{0.872 -0.9}{\sqrt{\frac{0.9(1-0.9)}{180}}}=-1.252  

p_v =P(z  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.1 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 10% the proportion of students who came from Arkansas or a bordering state is not significantly lower than 0.9

b. Fail to reject H0; conclude that the new policy increases the percentage of students from states that don’t border Arkansas

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation n  

n=180 represent the random sample taken

X=157 represent the students who came from Arkansas or a bordering state

\hat p=\frac{157}{180}=0.872 estimated proportion of students who came from Arkansas or a bordering state

p_o=0.9 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.1 represent the significance level

Confidence=90% or 0.90

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is higher or not than 0.9.:  

Null hypothesis:p\geq 0.9  

Alternative hypothesis:p < 0.9  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.872 -0.9}{\sqrt{\frac{0.9(1-0.9)}{180}}}=-1.252  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided \alpha=0.1. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.1 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 10% the proportion of students who came from Arkansas or a bordering state is not significantly lower than 0.9

b. Fail to reject H0; conclude that the new policy increases the percentage of students from states that don’t border Arkansas

You might be interested in
PLZ CHECK MY ANSWER. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

D. 70.34 cm^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of sector of a circle is given as θ/360*πr²

Where,

r = radius = 12 cm

θ = 56°

Use 3.14 as π

Plug in the values into the formula and solve

area = \frac{56}{360}*3.14*12^2

area = 70.34

Area of the sector ABC = 70.34 cm^2

The answer is D

4 0
4 years ago
A person places $290 in an investment account earning an annual rate of 2.2%, compounded continuously. Using the formula V = Pe^
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

<h2> $430.90</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the principal p= $290

rate r= 2.2%  2.2/100 =0.022  

time t= 18years

by applying the expression

V = Pe^{rt}

We have

V = 290e^{0.022*18}\\\\V=290e^{0.396}\\\\V=290*1.48586931755\\\\V=$430.90

Hence after 18years the money in the account will be $430.90

8 0
3 years ago
Question 6
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

33 children

62 adults

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up 2 equations (a=adults c=children)

The first equation will be 3.25(a)+3 = 300.5

The second equation will be a + c = 95

Subtract c from both sides to get:

a = 95 - c

Replace c in the 1st equation to get:

3.25(95-c) + 3c = 300.5

Distribute 3.25 to 95 and -c:

308.75 - 3.25c + 3c = 300.5

Subtract 308.75 from both sides:

-3.25c + 3c = 300.5 - 308.75

Combine like terms:

-0.25c = -8.25

Divide by -0.25

children = 33

Subtract 33 from 95 to get

adults = 62

3 0
3 years ago
Shaun has five coins in his pocket. If he empties the coins onto a table, what is the probability that all five coins will land
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

A. 1/32

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, the probability for one of the coins to land on heads is 1/2 cause a coin have to sides and chance is 50% that it will land on either of its sides.

If you have 2 coins the probability will be 1/2 for the first coin to land on heads and 1/2 for the second one. The overall probability for 2 coins would be (1/2)*(1/2)=1/4. You could also see it is 1/4 because all of the possible combinations of 2 coins are 4 (HH, HT, TH, TT) and HH is one of four.

It's the same if you have 5 coins. The probability will be (1/2)*(1/2)*(1/2)*(1/2)*(1/2)=1/32 in other words HHHHH is one of 32 possible combinations of 5 coins.

5 0
3 years ago
Explain the question and I'll add you as branlist
Ilya [14]

Answer:

What question? We need more context

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Lila decided to make more baked goods for the bake sale she used 1/8 lb less flour to make the bread then to make the cookies. S
    12·1 answer
  • Evaluate 9 over m+4 when m=3
    9·1 answer
  • What is the estimate of 324+285
    10·2 answers
  • How do I find the critical points?
    12·1 answer
  • Help please its due in 10 minutes
    7·1 answer
  • A rectangular prism is 7 inches long and 6 inches wide. Its volume is 336 cubic inches. What is the height of the rectangular pr
    11·1 answer
  • This word is used to describe an event which is almost, but not quite, certain to occur.
    13·2 answers
  • For the function g defined by g(x)= 55 x +3x find g(−x),−g(x), and −g(−x).
    15·1 answer
  • Solve for N:<br> -24 - N = 12<br> Explain how you solved it.
    9·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me i dont understand this at all and no one in my family knows this stuff
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!