All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is the solution for the inequaility below?-3x+2<8

Mathematics

1 answer:

Aleonysh [2.5K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

$x>-2$

Step-by-step explanation:

$-3x+2$

$-3x+2-2$

$-3x$

$\left(-3x\right)\left(-1\right)>6\left(-1\right)$

$3x>-6$

$\frac{3x}{3}>\frac{-6}{3}$

$x>-2$

You might be interested in

Subtract 1/8 - 1/4 - 1/2.

Ivan

Answer:

-5/8

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the least common denominator. It is 8.

1/8- 2/8- 4/8

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

20 kilograms increased by 25%

IgorC [24]

Answer:

25 kilograms

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

(y - 2)2 = y2 – 6y + 4<br> Is this statement true or false?

trasher [3.6K]

<h3>Answer: False</h3>

==============================================

Explanation:

I'm assuming you meant to type out

(y-2)^2 = y^2-6y+4

This equation is not true for all real numbers because the left hand side expands out like so

(y-2)^2

(y-2)(y-2)

x(y-2) .... let x = y-2

xy-2x

y(x)-2(x)

y(y-2)-2(y-2) ... replace x with y-2

y^2-2y-2y+4

y^2-4y+4

So if the claim was (y-2)^2 = y^2-4y+4, then the claim would be true. However, the right hand side we're given doesn't match up with y^2-4y+4

--------------------------

Another approach is to pick some y value such as y = 2 to find that

(y-2)^2 = y^2-6y+4

(2-2)^2 = 2^2 - 6(2) + 4 .... plug in y = 2

0^2 = 2^2 - 6(2) + 4

0 = 4 - 6(2) + 4

0 = 4 - 12 + 4

0 = -4

We get a false statement. This is one counterexample showing the given equation is not true for all values of y.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A total of 691 tickets were sold for the school play they were either adult tickets or student tickets there were fifty nine few

garri49 [273]

691 = A+ S
A=S+59
691 = S+59+S
691=2S+59
691-59 = 2S +59 -59
632 = 2S
316= S

5 0

3 years ago

The local oil changing business is very busy on Saturday mornings and is considering expanding. A national study of similar busi

eimsori [14]

Answer:

$t=\frac{4.2-3.6}{\frac{1.4}{\sqrt{16}}}=1.714$

Reject the null hypothesis if the observed "t" value is less than -2.131 or higher than 2.131

Rejection Zone: $t_{calculated}$ or $t_{calculated}>2.131$

In our case since our calculated value is not on the rejection zone we don't have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts and data given

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

$\bar X=4.2$ represent the sample mean

$s=1.4$ represent the sample standard deviation

n=16 represent the sample selected

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean is different from 3.6, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu = 3.6$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu \neq 3.6$

If we analyze the size for the sample is < 30 and we know the population deviation so is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{4.2-3.6}{\frac{1.4}{\sqrt{16}}}=1.714$

Critical values

On this case since we have a bilateral test we need to critical values. We need to use the t distribution with $df=n-1=16-1=15$ degrees of freedom. The value for $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2=0.025$ so we need to find on the t distribution with 15 degrees of freedom two values that accumulates 0.025 of the ara on each tail. We can use the following excel codes:

"=T.INV(0.025,15)" "=T.INV(1-0.025,15)"

And we got $t_{crit}=\pm 2.131$

So the decision on this case would be:

Reject the null hypothesis if the observed "t" value is less than -2.131 or higher than 2.131

Rejection Zone: $t_{calculated}$ or $t_{calculated}>2.131$

Conclusion

In our case since our calculated value is not on the rejection zone we don't have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance.

3 0

4 years ago