Answer: 1. statement d
2. statement d
Explanation:  This can be explained as follows :-
1.Government intervention should be done on those sectors that results in maximization of wealth. Private sector is the back bone of every  economy's free market, thus, protecting private property is the correct option.
.
2. Issuing patent right to the inventor will result in monopoly by that particular producer and that too of a necessary commodity hence option d is correct.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: a. The government shifted its resources from defense spending to helping big industries like the auto industry.
Explanation:
The era after the second world war saw massive government spending in the American economy. The government invested heavily in construction, education, the auto industry and others. 
This led to unparalleled prosperity as Americans enjoyed high employment and high growth rates which led to high consumption and investments such that the American economy surged forward in leaps and bounds. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
It is saying that it was $9 and it was then marked down on sale for 7:00. The tag is also telling you the size.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C. protects the current shareholders against a dilution of their ownership interests.
Explanation:
Preemptive rights are rights given to shareholders in an organization allowing them to buy additional shares in any future issue in order to maintain their percentage ownership, before the shares are available to the general public. It guards against dilution or decrease in a shareholders stake or ownership interest buy allowing them buy more shares for future issues before it is available for the general public to own shares. In doing so, shareholders avoid involuntary dilution. 
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The answer is 9%. According to the CBO, defense expenditure
grew 9% yearly on average from fiscal year 2000-2009. Much of the costs for the
conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been subsidized through regular arrogations
bills, but over emergency supplemental appropriations bills.