The Protestant Reformation was a religious, social, economic, and political revolution that was sparked when a Catholic monk named Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door of his local church. Luther believed the Catholic Church was corrupt, and he sought to reform it.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!! XD
P.S I love your profile pic! hehehe
The controversial nature of Franklin D. Roosevelt's immigration policies stemmed from the fact that they turned away those who were fleeing Nazi persecution.
<h3>Who was Franklin D. Roosevelt?</h3>
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a president.
- On (January 30, 1882 – April 12, 1945) was an American politician and attorney who served as the 32nd president of the United States from 1933 until his passing in 1945.
- He is sometimes referred to by his initials, FDR. In the first part of the 20th century, he played a major role in global events as a member of the Democratic Party and won a record number of presidential elections. In reaction to the worst economic crisis the United States had ever experienced, Roosevelt oversaw the federal government for the majority of the Great Depression and implemented his New Deal domestic agenda.
<h3>What is Immigration means?</h3>
- Immigration is the international movement of people to a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do not possess citizenship to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens.
- Commuters, tourists, and other short-term stays in a destination country do not fall under the definition of immigration or migration; seasonal labor immigration is sometimes included, however.
Learn more about Immigration here:
brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ4
Answer: The English acquired the secrets of chocolate from the Spanish through raids on Spanish ports.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
A) When the risk is low, the return is high
