Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The prime numbers are bold:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
a) We can see that as we go higher, twin primes seem less frequent but even considering that, there is an infinite number of twin primes. If you go high enough you will still eventually find a prime that is separated from the next prime number by just one composite number.
b) I think it's interesting the amount of time that has been devoted to prove this conjecture and the amount of mathematicians who have been involved in this. One of the most interesting facts was that in 2004 a purported proof (by R. F. Arenstorf) of the conjecture was published but a serious error was found on it so the conjecture remains open.
Answer:
A and B
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = - 7, x = - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the zeros let f(x) = 0 , that is
x² + 8x + 7 = 0
Consider the factors of the constant term (+ 7) which sum to give the coefficient of the x- term (+ 8)
The factors are + 7 and + 1 , since
7 × 1 = + 7 and 7 + 1 = + 8 , then
x² + 8x + 7 = 0
(x + 7)(x + 1) = 0 ← in factored form
Equate each factor to zero and solve for x
x + 7 = 0 ⇒ x = - 7
x + 1 = 0 ⇒ x = - 1
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
since the sum of the angles is 197°
it cannot have the given angle measures
Answer:
6x - 18
Step-by-step explanation:
2x−6+4x−12
