1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klemol [59]
3 years ago
7

( 2x + 1°) + ( x - 10°) = 90° Does the equation make sense why or why not ???

Mathematics
1 answer:
Mila [183]3 years ago
5 0

(2x+1)+(x-10)=90\\\\(2x+x)+(1-10)=90\\\\3x-9=90\ \ \ |+9\\\\3x=99\ \ \ |:3\\\\x=33^o

Yes. The equation make sense. It's has the solution.

x=33^o\\\\2x+1=2(33)+1=67^o\\\\x-10=33-10=23^o

You might be interested in
How do you write 10% as a decimal?
Tatiana [17]
10% as a decimal is 0.10


Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
59-(2c+3)=4(c+7)+c.
alisha [4.7K]

Step-by-step explanation:

{:}\leadsto\sf 59-(2c+3)=4 (c+7)+c

{:}\leadsto\sf 59-2c-3=4c+28+c

{:}\leadsto\sf 56-2c=5c+28

{:}\leadsto\sf 5c+28=56-2c

{:}\leadsto\sf 5c+2c=56-28

{:}\leadsto\sf 7c=28

{:}\leadsto\sf c={\dfrac {28}{7}}

{:}\leadsto\sf c=4

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Combine and simplify the following radical expression.
Nina [5.8K]

This is the answer and the steps

3 0
2 years ago
A city had population 67,255 on January 1,2000, and its population has been increasing by 2935 people each year since then. A li
bezimeni [28]

It is given in the question that

A city had population 67,255 on January 1,2000, and its population has been increasing by 2935 people each year since then.

Here initial population , b, is 67255, and the rate of increase of population is 2935 people each year. And that's the value of the slope .

Using slope intercept form, which is

y=mx+b

And substituting the values of m and b, we will get

p(t)=2935t +67255

5 0
3 years ago
Identify a counterexample to disprove 6n>n^2/6,where n is a real number.
scZoUnD [109]
Any number larger than 36 would be a counter examples.

When n is equal to 36, both sides of the inequality are equal to 216. As you get larger than 36 the right side is larger than the left side. Therefore, the inequality is not true.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • For which operations is the set {0, 1} closed?
    5·1 answer
  • Solve the following problem, supporting your work with a two-column proof.
    12·1 answer
  • Factor the expression 6x^2 + 5x + 1
    10·2 answers
  • The girl scouts are planning to sell chocolate cookies at $10.50 and lollipops at $2.50 each. They were able to collect $350 in
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me with these questions.
    10·1 answer
  • R - 2s = 14 for s <br><br> ILL MARK BRAINLIST PLS HELP !!! * solve for the indicated variable *
    15·1 answer
  • Homework: Compound Probability (With Replacement)
    15·1 answer
  • How do I solve this?​
    10·1 answer
  • I need help on this and I don't know how to do this.<br><br> Please Help
    11·2 answers
  • Find the perimeter of the figure. (Will mark brainliest of correct!)
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!