All categories

3 years ago

What is a statement that’s summarizes a pattern found in nature

Physics

2 answers:

sergey [27]3 years ago

5 0

The answer to your question is,

A scientific law.

-Mabel <3

polet [3.4K]3 years ago

3 0

Scientific law is a statement the summarizes a pattern found in nature

You might be interested in

_____Is defined as the conductors and equipment for delivering electric energy from the serving utility to the wiring system of

insens350 [35]

Answer:

Service.

Explanation:

Service equipment and service conductors runs from the service point to the service disconnecting point. Service provides the delivery of electrical energy from it's production point to the consumer where it is meant to be utilized.

3 0

3 years ago

You take a couple of capacitors and connect them in series, to which you observe a total capacitance

Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

Approximately $\rm 5.7\; \mu F$ and approximately $29\; \rm \mu F$ .

Explanation:

Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ denote the capacitance of these two capacitors.

When these two capacitors are connected in parallel, the combined capacitance will be the sum of $C_1$ and $C_2$ . (Think about how connecting these two capacitors in parallel is like adding to the total area of the capacitor plates. That would allow a greater amount of charge to be stored.)

$C(\text{parallel}) = C_1 + C_2$ .

On the other hand, when these two capacitors are connected in series, the combined capacitance should satisfy:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{C(\text{series})} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_2}$ .

(Consider how connecting these two capacitors in series is similar to increasing the distance between the capacitor plates. The strength of the electric field ( $V$ ) between these plates will become smaller. That translates to a smaller capacitance if the amount of charge stored $(Q)$ stays the same.)

The question states that:

$C(\text{parallel}) = 35\; \rm \mu F$ , and
$C(\text{series}) = 4.8\; \rm \mu F$ .

Let the capacitance of these two capacitors be $x\; \rm \mu F$ and $y\; \rm \mu F$ . The two equations will become:

$\displaystyle \left\lbrace \begin{aligned}& x + y = 35 \\ & \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} = \frac{1}{4.8}\end{aligned}\right.$ .

From the first equation:

$y = 35 - x$ .

Hence, the $y$ in the second equation here can be replaced with $(35 - x)$ . That equation would then become:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{35 - x} = \frac{1}{4.8}$ .

Solve for $x$ :

$\displaystyle \frac{x + (35 - x)}{x \, (35 - x)} = \frac{1}{4.8}$ .

$x\, (35 - x) = 4.8$ .

$x^2 - 35 \, x + 168 = 0$ .

Solve this quadratic equation for $x$ :

$x \approx 5.7$ or $x \approx 29.3$ .

Substitute back into the equation $y = 35 - x$ for $y$ :

$x \approx 5.7$ and $y \approx 29.3$ , or
$x \approx 29.3$ and $x \approx 5.7$ .

In other words, these two capacitors have only one possible set of capacitances (even though the previous quadratic equation gave two distinct real roots.) The capacitances of the two capacitors would be approximately $5.7\; \rm \mu F$ and approximately $29\; \rm \mu F$ (both values are rounded to two significant digits.)