Answer
A = 3321
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason for this answer is to get the Taxable income, you go by this equation AGI - (Exemptions + Deductions) since there is no deductions here we leave that part out. Subtract the AGI (32785) - 8200 the Exemption and you get 24585 then if we look on the chart, she is single and she falls under the answer of 3321!
Hope this helps, sorry I am a little late. I just got this answer too. :)
Answer:
the ones that are at 90 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Question:</em>
<em>Which of the following is NOT a formula for determining complementary probability?</em>
<em>A. P(outcome) = 1- P(-outcome)</em>
<em>B. P(outcome) - P(-outcome) = 1</em>
<em>C. P(outcome) + P(-outcome) =1</em>
<em>D. P(-outcome) = 1 - P(outcome)</em>
<em></em>
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Required
Determine which option is not a formula of complementary probabilities
From the list of given options, the complementary probabilities are P(outcome) and P(-outcome)
In probability;
--- Equation 1
Subtract P(outcome) from both sides

------ Equation 2
Subtract P(-outcome) from both sides of equation 1


Equation 1, 2 and 3 represents options A, C and D
While option B is out of place
<em>Hence, option B is not a formula of complementary probability</em>
Given :
a-b = c-d ...1)
b = d-1 ...2)
c = 6
To Prove :
a = 5
Solution :
Adding equation 1 and 2, we get :
(a-b) + (b) = (c-d) + (d-1)
a = c -1 ...3)
Putting given value of c = 6 in above equation, we get :
a = 6 - 1
a = 5
Hence, proved.
The correct term to fill in the blank would be discussion. When evaluating an observational study, the four factors that should be reviewed are Introduction, Methodology, Results, and Discussion. In an observational study, the researcher cannot control the variables. The researcher wold draw some inferences from a set of sample without controlling anything.