1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
3 years ago
12

Is it possible for an object to be (a) slowing down while its acceleration is increasing in magnitude; (b) speeding up while its

acceleration is decreasing? In both cases, explain your reasoning.
Physics
1 answer:
Sidana [21]3 years ago
5 0

a) Yes, if acceleration and velocity have opposite directions

b) Yes, if acceleration and velocity have same direction

Explanation:

a)

In order to answer this question, we have to keep in mind that both velocity and acceleration are vector quantities, so they have also a direction.

Acceleration is defined as the rate of change in velocity:

a=\frac{v-u}{t}

where

u is the initial velocity

v is the final velocity

t is the time elapsed

In this problem, the object is slowing down: this means that the magnitude of its velocity is decreasing, so

|v|

This means that the direction of the acceleration is opposite to the direction of the velocity. Then, the magnitude of the acceleration can be increasing (this will not affect the fact that the object will slow down, but it will affect only the rate at which the object is slowing down).

b)

In this case, the object is speeding up. This means that the magnitude of its velocity is increasing, so we have

|v|>|u|

In order for this to happen, it must be that the direction of the acceleration is the same as the direction of the velocity: therefore, this way, the magnitude of the velocity  will be increasing (either in the positive or in the negative direction).

Then, the magnitude of the acceleration can be decreasing (this will not affect the fact that the object will speed up, but it will only affect the rate at which the object is speeding up).

Learn more about acceleration:

brainly.com/question/9527152

brainly.com/question/11181826

brainly.com/question/2506873

brainly.com/question/2562700

#LearnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
A person is diving in a lake in the depth of h = 5.5 m. The density of the water is rho = 1.0 x10^3 kg/m^3. The pressure of the
Cloud [144]

Answer:a) P = Po + rho×h×g

b) P = 5.4 × 10^9 pa

c) F = P/A = (Po + rho×h×g)/A

d) 1.174×10^11N

Explanation: Using the formula

P = Po + rho×h×g

P =  1.0 x 10^5 + 1000 × 5.5 × 9.81

P = 5.4 × 10^9pa

The magnitude of the force exerted by water on the top of the person's head F at the depth h in terms of P

F = P/A = (Po + rho×h×g)/A

Using the above formula

Where A = 0.046m^2

F = P/ A = 5.4×10^9/0.046

F = 1.174×10^11N

3 0
3 years ago
Jasmine makes a note card about series circuits. she records the points shown. a 2 column table with 1 row. the column on the le
Bess [88]

Jasmine need to correct the error by switching the headings on the columns adding the title parallel circuits.

<h3>What is a parallel circuit?</h3>

A parallel circuit is a circuit in which the components are connected to a common junction. This implies that if one bulb goes out in a parallel connection, all the bulbs will go out.

As such, Jasmine need to correct the error by switching the headings on the columns adding the title parallel circuits.

Learn more about parallel connection: brainly.com/question/12400458

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
A 5kg object is moving at a height of 2 m. The potential energy of the object is closest to ___ j
elena55 [62]

Answer:

In this case, a body of mass 5 kg kept at a height of 10 m. So the potential energy is given as 5 * 10 *10 = 500 J.

6 0
3 years ago
Is there a definite end to our atmosphere?
Irina18 [472]
There is no definite end to earths atmosphere, but technically the border between the outer space and earth gets thinner as you move up from the earths surface. The Karman line is the closest definition there is which describes the end of the earth's atmosphere, it is 100 km above earth's sea level at approximately 1.56 % of total earth's radius. This describes the boundary between the outer space and the atmosphere.
7 0
3 years ago
In the broadest sense, what was the kinectic molecular theory designed to explain?
faust18 [17]

Answer: Kinetic Molecular Theory claims that gas particles are in continuous motion and completely demonstrate elastic collisions. Kinetic Molecular Theory can be used to describe the rules of both Charles and Boyle. A series of gas particles only has an average kinetic energy that is directly proportional to absolute temperature.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A tennis ball, a bowling ball, and a feather are dropped from the top of a tall building at the same time. Consider what you hav
    12·2 answers
  • If you rub an inflated balloon against your hair and place it against a door, by what mechanism does it stick? explain.
    6·1 answer
  • How to describe the motion of an object that has an acceleration of 0 m/s
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose that there are N=108 two-state systems, each with energy difference E=6 × 10-21 J between the two states. The environmen
    12·1 answer
  • A shopper pushes a grocery cart 41.9 m on level ground, against a 44.5 N frictional force. The cart has a mass of 16.3 kg. He pu
    10·1 answer
  • On my bike I was able to travel 40 miles in one hour from this information we can determine the bikes
    13·1 answer
  • How are engineers creating clothing that can charge your cell phone. Explain the science behind their innovation.
    13·1 answer
  • Help pls!
    14·1 answer
  • A couple is sitting side-by-side. By what factor should the distance between them be changed by if the attractive force is to be
    14·1 answer
  • 1. A box contains 10 blue chips. 5 red chips, and 15 yellow chips. Find the odds of choosing the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!