2. How should employers respond to K to 12 graduates who apply for vacant positions in
3. What were the perceived disadvantages of K to 12 graduates pcompared to college students?
4. What factors could give K to 12 graduates an advantage in the labor market?
Discussion Questions
1.
What is the dilemma K to 12 graduates face when applying for a job?
their company? Pa help asap po 2. How should employers respond to K to 12 graduates who apply for vacant positions in
3. What were the perceived disadvantages of K to 12 graduates pcompared to college students?
4. What factors could give K to 12 graduates an advantage in the labor market?
Discussion Questions
1.
What is the dilemma K to 12 graduates face when applying for a job?
their company? Pa help asap po 2. How 2. How should employers respond to K to 12 graduates who apply for vacant positions in
3. What were the perceived disadvantages of K to 12 graduates pcompared to college students?
4. What factors could give K to 12 graduates an advantage in the labor market?
Discussion Questions
1.
What is the dilemma K to 12 graduates face when applying for a job?
their company? Pa help asap po should employers respond to K to 12 graduates who apply for vacant positions in
3. What were the perceived disadvantages of K to 12 graduates pcompared to college students?
4. What factors could give K to 12 graduates an advantage in the labor market?
Discussion Questions
1.
What is the dilemma K to 12 graduates face when applying for a job?
their company? Pa help asap po
Answer:
A) Katie's maximum deduction is $200,000 x 20% = $40,000
But we must check that her deduction meets 3 requirements:
- cannot exceed 50% of her earned wages = $300,000 x 50% = $150,000 ✓ requirement met
- cannot exceed 25% of her earned wages + 2.5% of qualified property = ($300,000 x 25%) + ($150,000 x 2.5%) = $78,750 ✓ requirement met
- cannot exceed 20% of taxable income = $400,000 x 20% = $80,000 ✓ requirement met
B) Katie's maximum deduction is $400,000 x 20% = $80,000, but since her net business income is higher than her taxable income, she must calculate 20% x $350,000 (taxable income) = $70,000 (same as requirement 3 in previous answer)
Answer:
The Ideal Capital structure is approximately 20% of Debt and 50% of Equity. Thus, Optimal Capital Structure of Tobang Company is 40:60.
At 40% debt ratio the company’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is minimized.
Explanation:
Based on the cash and noncash transactions, the net change in non-cash working capital would be -$325.
<h3>How would the non-cash working capital change?</h3>
This can be found as:
= Increase in accounts receivables - Decrease in inventories - Decrease in prepaid expenses - Increase in PPE + Increase in accounts payable
Solving gives:
= 800 - 350 - 225 - 950 + 400
= -$325
The rest of the question is:
v) Increase in PP&E of $950
vi) Increase in accounts payable of $400
Find out more on net working capital at brainly.com/question/26214959.
#SPJ1
Answer:
First Year Depreciation: 12,400
Second Year Depreciation: 7,440
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}Year&Beginning\:Book&Dep \:Expense&Acc\:Dep&Ending\:Book\\0&-&-&-&31000\\1&31000&12400&12400&18600\\2&18600&7440&19840&11160\\3&11160&4464&24304&6696\\4&6696&2678.4&26982.4&4017.6\\5&4017.6&2017.6&29000&2000\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7DYear%26Beginning%5C%3ABook%26Dep%20%5C%3AExpense%26Acc%5C%3ADep%26Ending%5C%3ABook%5C%5C0%26-%26-%26-%2631000%5C%5C1%2631000%2612400%2612400%2618600%5C%5C2%2618600%267440%2619840%2611160%5C%5C3%2611160%264464%2624304%266696%5C%5C4%266696%262678.4%2626982.4%264017.6%5C%5C5%264017.6%262017.6%2629000%262000%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
To calculate each period depreciation we multiply the book value by the double-declining rate of 2/5
At the last year, you will depreciate until salvage value is reached.
