Answer:
0.7 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Irina was able to make the same distance from work to home in 0.4 of an hour at 27 miles per hour, we can use this rate and time to find the distance she travels to and from work using the general formula:
d = rt, where d=distance, r = rate and t = time
d = 27(0.4) = 10.8 miles
Since the distance from Irina's home to work is 10.8 miles, we can again use the formula 'd = rt' to find the time it takes her to bike to work at a rate of 16 miles per hour and solving for time, 't':
10.8 = (16)t
t = 0.7 hours
7/9 is the answer I believe
Point A would be the answer because...
The distance between A and C is point B, which doesn't land on -2
Point A lands on -2.
The distance between A and D would be points B and C, both don't land on -2.
The opposite of -2 would be positive 2 and thats point D.
I hope this helps love.
Answer: 9.34 x 10^3
Hope this helps
Answer:
Option B - False
Step-by-step explanation:
Critical value is a point beyond which we normally reject the null hypothesis. Whereas, P-value is defined as the probability to the right of respective statistic which could either be Z, T or chi. Now, the benefit of using p-value is that it calculates a probability estimate which we will be able to test at any level of significance by comparing the probability directly with the significance level.
For example, let's assume that the Z-value for a particular experiment is 1.67, which will be greater than the critical value at 5% which will be 1.64. Thus, if we want to check for a different significance level of 1%, we will need to calculate a new critical value.
Whereas, if we calculate the p-value for say 1.67, it will give a value of about 0.047. This p-value can be used to reject the hypothesis at 5% significance level since 0.047 < 0.05. But with a significance level of 1%, the hypothesis can be accepted since 0.047 > 0.01.
Thus, it's clear critical values are different from P-values and they can't be used interchangeably.
