Enormous O unpredictability is in reference to the most exceedingly terrible conceivable development rate of the calculation. So O(N log N) implies that it will never keep running in some time more terrible than O(N log N). So in spite of the fact that Al's calculation scales superior to Bob's quadratic algo, it doesn't really mean it is better for ALL info sizes.
Maybe there is critical overhead in building up it, for example, making a lot of clusters or factors. Remember that even an O(N log N) calculation could have 1000 non settled circles that official at O(N) and still be viewed as O(N log N) the length of it is the most exceedingly awful part.
Answer:
235 miles equals 5,280 feet
Explanation:
I would say that the answer has to be C
Since there is no change in mols on both sides of the equation the mass is constant
The ions of Noble gases, <em>group VIII</em> elements have a full octet configuration on their outermost shell and as such are highly stable.
The periodic table is a systematic arrangement of elements in order of their atomic numbers into a set of 8 columns each called groups and a set of 7 rows each called a period.
Elements are arranged in different groups according to the number of Valence electrons they have.
- For instance, elements in the group I of the periodic table are highly electropositive and as such are highly reactive.
The same is evident in group 7 elements are highly electronegative and have high electron affinity and as such are unstable and reactive.
- However, Noble gases, <em>group VIII</em> elements have a full octet configuration on their outermost shell and as such are highly stable.
Consequently, the <em>Noble gases ion</em> has a stable Valence electron configuration.
Read more:
brainly.com/question/5336231