Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

14

-6(1 + 7k) + 7(a + 6k) < -2

1 answer:

spin [16.1K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:idk

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

What is the rate of change for the function f(x)=2x-3

Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 2x - 3 is a linear function

The rate of change of a linear function is the measure of the slope.

The equation is in slope- intercept form, that is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

y = 2x - 3 has slope m = 2

Thus rate of change = 2

4 0

3 years ago

What is the product of -2x^3+x-5 and x^3-3x-4 ? (a) Show your work

saul85 [17]

Answer:

-3x3 - 2x - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

((((2•(x3))+x)-5x3)-3x)-4

(((2x3 + x) - 5x3) - 3x) - 4

Pulling out like terms :

4.1 Pull out like factors :

-3x3 - 2x - 4 = -1 • (3x3 + 2x + 4)

Polynomial Roots Calculator :

4.2 Find roots (zeroes) of : F(x) = 3x3 + 2x + 4

Polynomial Roots Calculator is a set of methods aimed at finding values of x for which F(x)=0

Rational Roots Test is one of the above mentioned tools. It would only find Rational Roots that is numbers x which can be expressed as the quotient of two integers

The Rational Root Theorem states that if a polynomial zeroes for a rational number P/Q then P is a factor of the Trailing Constant and Q is a factor of the Leading Coefficient

In this case, the Leading Coefficient is 3 and the Trailing Constant is 4.

The factor(s) are:

of the Leading Coefficient : 1,3

of the Trailing Constant : 1 ,2 ,4

Let us test ....

P Q P/Q F(P/Q) Divisor

-1 1 -1.00 -1.00

-1 3 -0.33 3.22

-2 1 -2.00 -24.00

-2 3 -0.67 1.78

-4 1 -4.00 -196.00

-4 3 -1.33 -5.78

1 1 1.00 9.00

1 3 0.33 4.78

2 1 2.00 32.00

2 3 0.67 6.22

4 1 4.00 204.00

4 3 1.33 13.78

Polynomial Roots Calculator found no rational roots

Final result :

-3x3 - 2x - 4

Processing ends successfully

plz mark me as brainliest :)

8 0

3 years ago

What are the solutions to the system of equations <br> {-x+y=4<br> {y+12=x^2+x

Gnoma [55]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

$y=4+x$ ............................................ (1)

$y=x^2+x-12$ ............................................ (2)

now equate both (1) and (2)

$4+x=x^2+x-12$

$=>x^2=16$

$x=-4,4$

now substitute the values of x ,

when $x=-4$ , y becomes 0

when $x=4$ , y becomes 8

so, solution set:

$(-4,0)$ and $(4,8)$

8 0

3 years ago

Golf-course designers have become concerned that old courses are becoming obsolete since new technology has given golfers the ab

zhenek [66]

Answer:

test statistic is ≈ -0.36

p-value is ≈ 0.64

There is no significant evidence that the average golfer can hit the ball more than 235 yards on average.

Step-by-step explanation:

a hypothesis test where H_0: mu = 235 and H_1:mu > 235

test statistic can be calculated as follows:

z= $\frac{X-M}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{N} } }$ where

sample mean driving distance (233.8 yards)

M is the average expected distance that the average golfer can hit the ball under null hypothesis. (235 yards)

s is the standard deviation (46.6 yards)

N is the sample size (192)

Then test statistic is z= $\frac{233.8-235}{\frac{46.6}{\sqrt{192} } }$ =-0.3568

p-value is 0.64 >0.05

There is no significant evidence that the average golfer can hit the ball more than 235 yards on average.

6 0

4 years ago

Copy the problems onto your paper, mark the givens and prove the statements asked. Given: ∠BTO ≅ ∠IWE WI ≅ BT , OW ≅ ET Prove: △

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

$\triangle BOT \cong \triangle IEW$

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

$\angle BTO \cong \angle IWE\\WI \cong BT\\OT \cong EW$

We have to prove:

$\triangle BOT \cong \triangle IEW$

Proof:

$\text{In }\triangle BOT \text{ and } \triangle IEW$

we can write:

$\angle BTO = \angle IWE\text{ (Given)}\\WI \cong BT\text{ (Given)}\\OT \cong EW\text{ (Given)}$

Hence, the two triangle are congruent by SAS congruency rule.

$\triangle BOT \cong \triangle IEW$

The attached image shows the two triangle.

8 0

3 years ago