H is the number of hours worked. So the expression 200h+250 is 200 times the number of hours plus 250.
Here's a few computations using different values for h
1 hour --> (200)(1)+250 = 450
2 hours --> (200)(2) + 250 = 650
3 hours --> (200)(3)+250 = 850
10 hours --> (200)(10)+250 = 2250
As you can see the 250 is fixed. It gets added to the cost no matter how many hours the lawyer works. This is most likely a flat fee. Just to meet the lawyer you pay $250.
The 200 gets multiplied by the hours worked. So the 200 is an hourly rate. The more hours the lawyer works, the more he gets paid because this part of the expression depends on the hours worked.
Thus, an interpretation of the expression 200h + 250 is that the lawyer charges a fee of $250 per consultation and an additional $200 per hour on top of that.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we have that the original point is given by:
B = (7, 2)
As the point is reflected through the x axis, then we have the following transformation:
(x, y) --------------> (x, -y) -------------> (x ', y')
Applying the transformation to the original ordered pair we have:
(7, 2) --------------> (7, - (2)) -------------> (7, -2)
Answer:
Point B 'is given by:
B '= (7, -2)
Answer:
B. The solution is valid because all steps to solve the inequality for F are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
F - 32 ≤ 0
Add 32 to both sides of the equation to have;
F -32 + 32 ≤ 0 + 32
F ≤ 0 + 32
F ≤ 32
It can be observed that to solve for F, the steps are correct. Thus the solution is valid. Therefore, the correct choice in the given question is the solution is valid because all steps to solve the inequality for F are correct.
Answer: transportation
Step-by-step explanation:
