The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example (updated by Professor Sandel to the Michael Jordan example) is supposed to illustrate that "liberty upsets patterns and, therefore, the entitlement conception of justice requires illegitimate restrictions of liberty. This applies to justice in holdings and justice in transfer.
American professor Robert Nozick, known for its interesting work at Harvard University, was a justice researcher and theorist who studied libertarian rights and the role of justice in modern society.
In 1974, he wrote the influential book called "Anarchy, State and Utopia," in which he defended the existence of a non-interventional state that granted liberties to citizens with minimal or none interference in the lives of people.
C :) person above got the explaining :)) tell me if i’m wrong tho :)
Answer: Their cultures have different display rules
Explanation:
Display rules are rules that govern how people behave in the society, how they express themselves and how people see them behave. This can be influenced by culture, place of worship or other social factors.
Many people adhere to cultural rules very well and they tend to put on different attitude when they are alone, this is called display rules, and it's influenced by many factors
D is the answer as shown on picture