Which of the following is not a purpose of the American Sociological Association’s code of ethics?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Delvig [45]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The correct response is Option C: to ensure the financial gain of the researcher(s).

Explanation:

Most social scientists do not conduct their academic research for financial gain so this is not a part of the American Sociological Association's code of ethics. The ethics are in place to encourage research that protects the rights of research subjects and promotes a professional level of neutrality in sociological research. Researchers need to be conscientious about how their research may impact the study population and the individual people who are participating in their research. They usually have to assure confidentiality regarding sensitive topics, for example.

You might be interested in

Which countries are included in the term Latin America?

Ivenika [448]

Answer:Peru, Venezuela, Chile, Guatemala, Ecuador, Cuba, Bolivia, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Paraguay, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Puerto Rico, Uruguay, Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana, Saint Martin and Saint Barthelemy.

8 0

3 years ago

Who was Augustin de Iturbide? *

Karolina [17]

None of these are correct

7 0

3 years ago

Federal prosecutors announced Friday that they won’t file charges against a white police officer who shot Jacob Blake in Wiscons

SashulF [63]

Yes that is indeed racist on many levels and the fact that are government system protect or care to protect us is a bad personal and political move.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are there an odd number of justices on the Supreme Court?

ad-work [718]

This is most likely because of the ease when making judicial rulings. If there is an odd number of judges, then there will rarely be a tie vote. This can only occur when judges decide to abstain from voting. Most likely, the current court has an odd number of Justices to prevent an evenly split decision.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Carl rodgers describe an individual that has reached his/her full potential by living a life defined by unconditional love, genu

Aleks04 [339]

Carl Rodgers describe an individual that has reached his/her full potential by living a life defined by unconditional love, genuineness, openness and empathy as a <u>Fully Functioning Person.</u>

Carl Rogers came up with five things that a fully functioning person has:

1. Be willing to try new things and accept both good and bad feelings. Negative feelings are not ignored; instead, they are dealt with.

2.Existential living means being in touch with different experiences as they happen in life and not judging or making assumptions about them ahead of time. Being able to live in the present and enjoy it fully, instead of always thinking about the past or the future.

3. Trust your feelings: You pay attention to and trust your feelings, instincts, and gut reactions. The right decisions are the ones that people make for themselves, and we should trust ourselves to make the right ones.

4. Creativity: Thinking creatively and taking risks are important parts of a person's life. People don't always play it safe. This means being able to adapt, change, and look for new experiences.

5. A fulfilled life is one in which a person is happy and content with their life, and they are always looking for new things to do and learn.

To know more about fully functioning person refer to:

brainly.com/question/7157264

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago