Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": anchoring and adjustment heuristic.
Explanation:
Anchoring-and-Adjustment heuristics refers to estimations made by individuals according to certain information that come to their minds that are adjusted until an acceptable level of accuracy is reached. The latter is the cause of this practice to be inefficient because it is based on finding one optimal level of accuracy only without looking for others that could provide more proper results.
Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: A $50 billion decrease in government spending would be the most contractionary fiscal policy.
A. Increase the taxes by $40 billion is also a contractionary fiscal policy but it doesn't have a greater impact than decreasing the government spending by $50 billion.
B. It is an expansionary fiscal policy.
D. There are both expansionary fiscal policy by decreasing taxes by $10 billion and contractionary fiscal policy by decreasing government spending by $40 billion. But it doesn't have much impact as the option (C) is having.
Therefore, Option (C) is having the most contractionary fiscal policy.
Starting from a steady state with greater capital than the Golden Rule, a decrease in the saving rate results in a decline in investment.
<h3>What is the definition of the golden rule?</h3>
The Golden Rule instructs people to make decisions for others based on their own personal preferences. Putting yourself in another person's shoes or "doing unto others as you would have them do unto you" are two common definitions of the Golden Rule (Baumrin 2004).
The golden rule would advise us to release someone who has been convicted of a crime and given a prison sentence, for instance, because we would not want to go to prison ourselves. This holds true even if we use the platinum rule because it's likely that the prisoner would choose to stay out of jail or prison.
To learn more about Golden Rule, refer to:
brainly.com/question/16313509
#SPJ4
The price of an item can rise or fall