Answer:
Pakicetus had an ear bone with a characteristic specific to whales and a distinctive long skull shape of a whale's.
Pakicetus
• Pakicetus was a wolf-sized animal and was a carnivore that at certain occasions consumed fish had exhibited features of its anatomy that associated it to the modern cetaceans, porpoises, whales, and dolphins.
• It had the body of a land animal, however, its head exhibited the distinctive long skull similar to a whale.
• With time, the fossils also showed that Pakicetus possessed an ear bone with a characteristic specific to whales.
Thus, pakicetus can be considered as the first whale who exhibited certain similar anatomic features like that of a whale.
Find out more information about Pakicetus anatomy here:
brainly.com/question/16395727
Explanation:
Tyler has broken his sternum. The sternum is the breastbone
Phosphate groups of the nucleotides in the diagram are marked with W.
Option C.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
DNA is a macro molecule which is formed of polymerization of deoxyribonucleotides. Four types of deoxyribonucleotides are present which are adenosine, guanosine, thymidine and cytosine triphosphate. These nucleotides are polymerized based on the genetic setup.
The phosphate groups attached with the sugar molecule are actually polymerized with the o glycosidic bond. That's marked with the letter W. These phosphate molecules are attached with the sugar molecules which actually are attached with the nitrogen bases. They in total forms a nucleotide, hence the whole DNA. X in the diagram are nitrogen bases and the Y are the hydrogen bonds between the complementary nitrogen bases
<u>Answer:</u>
1. Pectoral girdle
2. They are composed of cartilage
3. The basketball player probably has larger vertebrae in the spinal column
4. Clavicle
5. Consists of three parts: the manubrium, the body (gladiolus) and the xiphoid process
<u>Explanation:</u>
Took the quiz, got 100% with these answers.
Having one theory is setting a limit on your potential and the potential of the overall theory and subject you are working on. Having multiple theories gives you a broader idea and perspective of what is going on, and even though one may slightly contradict the other, it is okay because that is what theories are for.
To the point, scientists usually have more than one theory so that they can gain a broader perspective on the matter and maybe even increase the chance of being correct on the matter.
Hope this was helpful.
Cheers,
