1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
13

A ball is thrown from a height of 105 feet with an initial downward velocity of 9 ft/s. The ball's height h (in feet) after t se

conds is given by the following.
h = 105 - 9t-16t^2
How long after the ball is thrown does it hit the ground?
Round your answer(s) to the nearest hundredth.
(If there is more than one answer, use the "or" button.)
1 =
seconds
X
5
?
ground
Mathematics
1 answer:
zloy xaker [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

t = 2.28 s

Step-by-step explanation:

h = 105 - 9t - 16t ^ 2

0 ft = 105 ft - 9t -16^t

To find the roots of a quadratic function we have to use the Bhaskara formula , the roots will give us the time it takes to reach zero height

ax^2 + bx + c  = 0

-16^t - 9t + 105 ft = 0 ft

a = -16    b = -9    c = 105

t1 = (-b + √ b^2 - 4ac)/2a

t2 =(-b - √ b^2 - 4ac)/2a

t1 = (9 + √(-9^2 - (4 * (-16) * 105)))/2 * (-16)

t1 = (9 + √(-81 + 6720))/ -32

t1 = (9 + √6639)/ -32

t1 = (9 + 81.84)/ -32

t1 = 90.84 / -32

t1 = -2.83 s

t2 = (9 - √(-9^2 - (4 * (-16) * 105)))/2 * (-16)

t2 = (9 - √(-81 + 6720))/ -32

t2 = (9 - √6639)/ -32

t2 = (9 - 81.84)/ -32

t2 = -72.84 / -32

t2 = 2.28 s

we have two possible values, we are only going to take the positive one, beacause we are talking about time

t2 = 2.28 s

You might be interested in
What’s the answer to this? Find 1/8 of 88
guapka [62]

Answer:

11

Step-by-step explanation:

\frac{1}{8} of 88

= \frac{88}{8}

= 11

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Prove that if {x1x2.......xk}isany
Radda [10]

Answer:

See the proof below.

Step-by-step explanation:

What we need to proof is this: "Assuming X a vector space over a scalar field C. Let X= {x1,x2,....,xn} a set of vectors in X, where n\geq 2. If the set X is linearly dependent if and only if at least one of the vectors in X can be written as a linear combination of the other vectors"

Proof

Since we have a if and only if w need to proof the statement on the two possible ways.

If X is linearly dependent, then a vector is a linear combination

We suppose the set X= (x_1, x_2,....,x_n) is linearly dependent, so then by definition we have scalars c_1,c_2,....,c_n in C such that:

c_1 x_1 +c_2 x_2 +.....+c_n x_n =0

And not all the scalars c_1,c_2,....,c_n are equal to 0.

Since at least one constant is non zero we can assume for example that c_1 \neq 0, and we have this:

c_1 v_1 = -c_2 v_2 -c_3 v_3 -.... -c_n v_n

We can divide by c1 since we assume that c_1 \neq 0 and we have this:

v_1= -\frac{c_2}{c_1} v_2 -\frac{c_3}{c_1} v_3 - .....- \frac{c_n}{c_1} v_n

And as we can see the vector v_1 can be written a a linear combination of the remaining vectors v_2,v_3,...,v_n. We select v1 but we can select any vector and we get the same result.

If a vector is a linear combination, then X is linearly dependent

We assume on this case that X is a linear combination of the remaining vectors, as on the last part we can assume that we select v_1 and we have this:

v_1 = c_2 v_2 + c_3 v_3 +...+c_n v_n

For scalars defined c_2,c_3,...,c_n in C. So then we have this:

v_1 -c_2 v_2 -c_3 v_3 - ....-c_n v_n =0

So then we can conclude that the set X is linearly dependent.

And that complet the proof for this case.

5 0
3 years ago
Bill has enough money to buy no more than 1/2 pound of cheese. How much cheese could he buy?
andriy [413]
1/2 I guess I don't  think you typed in the question correctly. Not trying to be mean.
3 0
3 years ago
Is 290.45 higher than 2867.5
tekilochka [14]
2867.5 is bigger

Even though they both show 5 numbers, the second one has only one decimal place versus 2 on the first

If you ignore the decimal, your left with
290 vs 2867

2867 is much bigger than 290 so this is the answer
5 0
2 years ago
Divide the polynomials:<br> x^2-3x+9/x-2
Kruka [31]

The value of dividing x^2-3x+9 by x-2 is x + 3

<h3>Ways of dividing polynomials</h3>

There are several ways to divide polynomial functions; some of these ways include

  • By factorization
  • By long division
  • By synthetic division
  • By using technology such as graph

<h3>How to divide the polynomials?</h3>

The expression for the polynomial division is given as:

x^2-3x+9/x-2

To divide polynomial functions, we make use of the division by factorization method

Start by expanding the numerator of the polynomial division

x^2-3x+9/x-2 = x^2 + 3x - 6x + 9/x-2

Factorize the equation

x^2-3x+9/x-2 = x(x + 3) - 2(x + 3)/x - 2

Factor out x + 3 from the numerator

x^2-3x+9/x-2 = (x- 2)(x + 3)/x - 2

Cancel out the common factors

x^2-3x+9/x-2 = x + 3

Hence, the value of dividing x^2-3x+9 by x-2 is x + 3

Read more about polynomial division at:

brainly.com/question/25289437

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Round 31.320 to the nearest hundred
    8·2 answers
  • Somebody please help me with my geometry.
    12·1 answer
  • Is 23.6404 greater than 23.64112?
    6·2 answers
  • What is 1/5 out of 40
    13·2 answers
  • Make 45/12 a mixed number.
    7·1 answer
  • (6CQ) Evaluate the limit, or state that the limit does not exist. 2n+7n/13n
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone help with this problem?
    15·1 answer
  • Calculate the inverse of the matrix and find the values for a, b, c, and d:
    12·1 answer
  • Select all possible values for x that solve the equation x^2=800
    14·2 answers
  • Water makes up about 71% of Earth's surface, while the other 29% consists of continents
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!