Answer:
Productivy would go up only as long as some of the workers can become competent managers.
Explanation:
The problem with worker ownership of the means of production (the firm), which is what socialism is about, is that workers do not necessarily have managerial skill, and as result, are likely to be unable to run the company efficiently.
In case this does not happen, and the workers manage to run the company well, GDP would increase because productivity in the firm would rise. Inflation would likely fall down because more productivity means more output of goods and services, and inflation tends to have a inverse relationship with output (although it also depends on other variables like the rate of growth of the money supply).
Finally, another macroeconomic variable that would positively affected is employment rate, because a more efficient company would likely require new workers.
The busiest place in india so her bussiness can go all the way up in stock and in growth of money and development
Answer:
We'll start by putting into consideration, the large sample variance at the numerator.
Barron's Variance will be represented using 1 as the subscript.
i.e.
1 = $583 million
2 = $489 million
So,
0: 1²= 2²
: 1² ≠ 2²
=1² / 2²=
= $583 million² / $489 million²
= 583²/489²
= 1.42
Degrees of freedom 15 and 9
Using F table, area in tail is greater than 0.10.
Two-tail p-value is greater than .20
Exact p-value corresponding to F= 1.42 is .5874 (See F table)
p-value > .10
So,we do not reject 0.
We cannot conclude there is a statistically significant difference between the variances for the two companies.
I want to say c but i am not sure, if it's not c it'd d for sure. Hope that was some help:)
