Answer:
0.000003782 m
0.000001891 m
0.000001197125 m
Explanation:
= Wavelength = 248 nm
D = Diameter of beam = 1 cm
f = Focal length = 0.625 cm
The angle is given by

The width is given by

The required width is 0.000003782 m
Minimum resolvable line separation is given by

The minimum resolvable line separation between adjacent lines is 0.000001891 m
when 

The new minimum resolvable line separation between adjacent lines is

If it produces 20J of light energy in a second, then that 20J is the 10% of the supply that becomes useful output.
20 J/s = 10% of Supply
20 J/s = (0.1) x (Supply)
Divide each side by 0.1:
Supply = (20 J/s) / (0.1)
<em>Supply = 200 J/s </em>(200 watts)
========================
Here's something to think about: What could you do to make the lamp more efficient ? Answer: Use it for a heater !
If you use it for a heater, then the HEAT is the 'useful' part, and the light is the part that you really don't care about. Suddenly ... bada-boom ... the lamp is 90% efficient !
Answer:
The magnitude of the horizontal displacement of the rock is 7.39 m/s.
Explanation:
Given that,
Initial speed = 11.5 m/s
Angle = 50.0
Height = 30.0 m
We need to calculate the horizontal displacement of the rock
Using formula of horizontal component

Put the value into the formula


Hence, The magnitude of the horizontal displacement of the rock is 7.39 m/s.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When an object is held higher, it has more potential energy because more energy is stored from its higher position to swing further than it would have, had it been held lower.
Answer:
Generally speaking, as the human population grows, our consumption of natural resources increases. More humans consume more freshwater, more land, more clothing, etc. ... For example, natural gas plants have become increasingly more efficient, thus humans are able to obtain more energy out of the same amount of gas.
Rapid population growth is detrimental to achieving economic and social progress and to sustainable management of the natural resource base. But there remains a sizeable gap between the private and social interest in fertility reduction, and this gap needs to be narrowed.