Answer:
1) There are 13 students in Jerry's study.
2) There are 39 students in Kathy's study.
3) Jerry's study is more trustworthy!
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Jerry's study is the one with the dot plot.
Now, the number of students is calculated by adding the total number of dots in the plot.
We have a total of 13 dots.
Thus, there are 13 students in Jerry's study.
2) Kathy's study is the one with the histogram.
The total number of students is gotten by adding the corresponding number of students on the y-axis for each range of distance on the x-axis.
Total number of students = 9 + 11 + 7 + 12 = 39 students
3) Jerry's study where he used a dot plot is likely to be more trustworthy because it gives exact values of the number of students for each distance represented whereas, Kathy's study where she used a histogram doesn't give exact values but just gives a range of distances for a particular number of people.
Answer:
uh
Step-by-step explanation:
cant see the picture
f
Answer:
11.2$
Step-by-step explanation:
Kristina and Melissa had 32$ at total
● 32$ => 100%
They have spent 35%
Let x be that amount
● x => 35%
●32 => 100
● x => 35
● x = (35×32)/100 = 11.2$
They have spent 11.2$
Answer:
y = 50x + 25
Step-by-step explanation:
y = mx + b
Answer: it seems to be D, but the equation makes practically no sense!
The value of the factor changes for the different amounts of service years and vacation weeks.
Step-by-step explanation: The equation means that the employee is trying to figure out the value of the "v-factor" for how vacation time is earned.
If you substitute the number of service years into the left side of the "formula" and vacation weeks on the right side, then solve for "v", v(15)=5 you get v= 1/3 or 0.33
If you substitute other numbers, like v(2)=2, so v= 1 then v(30) = 8, v = 4/15 or 0.2667. You see the factor's value decreases. The company is much more generous to to employees with one or two years of service than with the older ones.
