Answer:
The overall Sales revenue at break even is $515995.872
Explanation:
The overall break even in dollars or the composite break even point is the Total revenue that a business must earn from all its products that should be equal to the total costs from all its products and there is no profit or no loss.
The formula for composite or overall break even in dollars is,
Break even in dollars = Fixed costs / Weighted average contribution margin ratio
Where the weighted average contribution margin ratio is the weghtage of each product in the overall sales mix multiplied by the contribution margin of each product.
The total sales mix is = 8 + 4 + 1 = 13
Weighted average contribution margin ratio = ((360 - 210) / 360) * 8/13 +
((500 - 300) / 500) * 4/13 + ((1600 - 600) / 1600) * 1/13 = 0.5814 or 58.14%
Break even in dollars = 300000 / 0.5814
Break even in dollars = $515995.872
If there is some discrepancy in the final answer, it will be due to the rounding off of the weighted average contribution margin ratio
Answer:
The Answer is D: Nominal group technique
Explanation:
From the question, it is clear that the CEO of Mi Ola is encouraging everyone to bring up that idea they have in mind. She is encouraging everyone to make a decision as it is never wrong as long as you're moving. Bounded rationality talks about making rational decisions that will most likely satisfy personal needs. This does not seem to be the kind of statement made here. The statement is like a booster to everyone to come up with ideas, which bring us to the concept of nominal group technique. This technique encourages contributions from an entire team and encourages swift agreement on the relative significance of problems, issues, and solutions.
Answer:
Solution:
A.
p_x=3, G_x=\frac {100}{3}=33\frac{1}{3}p
x
=3,G
x
=
3
100
=33
3
1
p_y=5, G_y=\frac{100}{5}=20p
y
=5,G
y
=
5
100
=20
B.
100-0.25\times 100=75100−0.25×100=75
p_x=3, G_x=\frac {75}{3}=25p
x
=3,G
x
=
3
75
=25
p_y=5, G_y=\frac{75}{5}=15p
y
=5,G
y
=
5
75
=15
C.
p_x=6, G_x=\frac {100}{6}=16\frac{2}{3}p
x
=6,G
x
=
6
100
=16
3
2
D.
p_y=5, G_y=\frac{100}{4}=25p
y
=5,G
y
=
4
100
=25
2.
MU_x=68-60=8, p_x=2MU
x
=68−60=8,p
x
=2
MU_y=29-25=4, p_y-?MU
y
=29−25=4,p
y
−?
\frac {MU_x}{p_x}=\frac{MU_y}{p_y}
p
x
MU
x
=
p
y
MU
y
\frac{8}{2}=\frac {4}{p_y}
2
8
=
p
y
4
p_y=1p
y
=1
Answer:
Unrealized holding loss - Income (purchase commitments) $ 52,900 Dr
Estimated liability on purchase commitments ( $ 1,001,800 - $ 948,900 ) $ 52,900 Cr
Explanation:
Unrealized holding loss - Income (purchase commitments) $ 52,900 Dr
Estimated liability on purchase commitments ( $ 1,001,800 - $ 948,900 ) $ 52,900 Cr
